Unbearable

Kellie 2021-11-28 08:01:17

I admit that I have always been more tolerant of European and American films, especially large-scale magic films, at least in terms of visual effects, scene design, etc. People generally start with special effects of 10 yuan, which is worth the ticket price. Of course, there is another reason that is so bad that we can hardly see the bad European and American movies that are currently at the level of many domestically produced movies, because they basically have no way of spreading to the back of the earth. Even European and American actors are also familiar with most of the acting skills.
So when the first episode of "The Chronicles of Narnia" appeared, I was still very excited: a fantasy epic blockbuster, still a blockbuster with profound meanings, which is very appetizing to me.
In the end, I went to the theater and watched it. I stayed in the middle and didn’t fall asleep, and I felt uncomfortable. The scene was beautiful enough, and the production was not unconcerned. Although the story was not well told, it was at least rounded out. What's the problem?
It happened to those little actors, especially the youngest Lucy.
To be honest, it's been a long time since I saw such a bad child star in Hollywood. The little girl is very cute, but she carries it from beginning to end, showing me very cute and innocent, so that the audience can’t enter the scene, and the other three are not good, but she is a little bit better than her. , But the face value is not high! The poor appearance makes it harder to ignore their terrible acting skills, especially in the background of the powerful ice queen and the lifelike lion Aslan, the four little protagonists are passersby than passersby, except for the protagonist who is not dead. Halo, the others are really terrible.
Perhaps it is precisely because of this imbalance that makes people really uninterested and unable to enter the show.
The original The Legend of Garnarnia itself is not well-known in the country, and such a bad interpretation falls into the evaluation of "it turns out to be a children's film".
In fact, the original works, like the Lord of the Rings series, were not well known in China before the film. It was the success of the film that drove the promotion of the original works.
So Narnia failed, just admit it, the little actor played too many times.
You can also make a horizontal comparison of "Pan's Labyrinth", which has a fairly similar theme. The little girl played so well and completely brought the audience in. Finally, when the girl left the world, it was really distressing.
The reason why I put this question on the third part is that there is a comparison template in the third part, that is, the ugly and cute Will Poulter. Although his appearance is really low, his acting skills are really good. There is no scum left in a few seconds.
The Dawn Treader continues to start from the heroine in various aspects, only Will’s performance is natural, which makes you think he is that true color, but if you have watched "Moving Maze" or "The Miller Family", you can compare this The difference in the role of the child is that even the temperament has changed.
Will's shortcoming is that his appearance is really not high, but because of this, he can create a world, and he is definitely strong enough!

View more about The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader reviews

Extended Reading

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader quotes

  • [a bird lands beside Eustace and caws]

    Eustace Clarence Scrubb: [about Reepicheep] In England, we have mouse traps for that sort of thing. Speaking of food, you don't know where I could get any, do you?

    Tavros: Uh, why are you talking to that bird?

    Eustace Clarence Scrubb: Uh, I just naturally assumed that you can...

    Tavros: [busts out laughing] He's talking to birds!

    Telmarine Sailor: He's mad as a loon, that one!

    Tavros: Yeah!

  • Eustace Clarence Scrubb: Oh, you're a boat in a magical land. Can't you row yourself?