Documentary, in my opinion, is the record of the real situation. Some netizens said that the one star is only because you did not understand the true purpose of this documentary.
The main focus is:
1. The title of the film is don't fuck with cat. Coupled with the description of the animal protectionists in the title, I think this is the gist of the film. Don't mess with the cat, or you won't be able to eat and walk around. So a little evasiveness is light.
2. Lack of respect for the victim.
3. There is also a question at the end of the film: Are you all accomplices? This was pointed out by netizens that it was suspected of being eye-catching.
I mention my question:
Do documentaries need to be so esoteric? If even the gist can be misunderstood, is it because the producers wanted the film to be controversial? Or neglect? Or are netizens stupid enough to not be able to see the gist?
View more about Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer reviews
