One star, did we not understand?

Terrence 2022-11-13 12:54:02

Documentary, in my opinion, is the record of the real situation. Some netizens said that the one star is only because you did not understand the true purpose of this documentary.

The main focus is:

1. The title of the film is don't fuck with cat. Coupled with the description of the animal protectionists in the title, I think this is the gist of the film. Don't mess with the cat, or you won't be able to eat and walk around. So a little evasiveness is light.

2. Lack of respect for the victim.

3. There is also a question at the end of the film: Are you all accomplices? This was pointed out by netizens that it was suspected of being eye-catching.

I mention my question:

Do documentaries need to be so esoteric? If even the gist can be misunderstood, is it because the producers wanted the film to be controversial? Or neglect? Or are netizens stupid enough to not be able to see the gist?

View more about Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer reviews

Extended Reading
  • Curtis 2022-05-28 20:25:49

    I didn't expect the content to be such a documentary. The animal protector has a very good heart, and he will blame and introspect himself, but the abnormal ones will not.

  • Mallory 2022-05-28 22:42:47

    At first, it was only clicked on the subject of online tracking of cat abusers. Unexpectedly, watching it led to a case that shocked the North American Chinese community a few years ago. At the end, it turned out to be a meta. After reading it in one breath, although the evidence chain of the network tracking team and the intervention of the police are slightly looser and less dramatic and neat, the whole tracking and the perspective of peeling off the cocoon are pressing and suppressing and relaxing, opening a familiar old case from a new perspective. It is worthwhile one look.