I found that my interpretation of the third episode was different from everyone... The real protagonist should be a hacker

Rhett 2022-03-21 09:02:32

After reading a lot of drama reviews, I found that everyone has a lot of opinions on pedophiles, and they focus on the personal lives of the few people under surveillance. I personally didn't focus on that when I watched it. Don't forget the theme of this show! We tend to be disgusted with pedophiles, in fact, because some pedophiles rape children. But the male protagonist doesn't. He just looks at a few pictures and masturbates to satisfy his physiological needs. Heterosexuals can't handle their own desires and rape the opposite sex, homosexuals can't handle their own desires and rape the same-sex, and pedophiles can't handle their own desires and rape children. These are all crimes, and they are all for the same reason. The key is that the male protagonist is afraid of being exposed because everyone generally has such a stereotyped impression: feeling that pedophilia is a crime, or a perversion, no one will care whether he rapes children or not. He was afraid that he would be regarded as a demon-like existence. But he is just different from others. He likes children, and smiling at them is not a crime... And the person who is looking for a prostitute shouldn't be considered a crime, right? (I mean he didn't hurt anyone, of course the family's sadness is not counted, otherwise it would be a crime to break up) This person is considered a moral problem, dare to ask where there are no moral problems in this world, and who can completely solve or avoid this class question? I think the real protagonist is the hacker who never shows up. Don't forget that the theme of this play is the relationship between technology and people in the future: Our lives are unknowingly being watched by people with bad intentions, playing with us... that's terrifying. People are pedophiles, looking at photos and masturbating, no one hurts, what does it have to do with others? If someone cheats, I'm sorry for my wife and children. If he is found, he will lose everything. He deserves it. If he is lucky enough not to be found, no one will know. What sane person would do such a thing? Although some people have high IQs, good computer skills, and are hackers, their morals are not good, their cognition can’t keep up, they can’t tolerate the differences of others, and they can’t stand the immorality of others. They are the ones who commit the crime. It is terrible to use high technology and other people's pain points to destroy the lives of those who have nothing to do with them, even their lives. (Personal opinion, welcome to discuss, don't like kissing, be civilized)

View more about Nosedive reviews

Extended Reading

Nosedive quotes

  • Ryan: [picks up Pelican Cove brochure] Pelican Cove? What is this? A eugenics program?

    Lacie: A lifestyle community.

    Ryan: [looks at the photo on the brochure] No one is *this* happy. A two-year-old with a fucking balloon isn't this happy.

  • Hansen: So in terms of quality, you could use a punch up right there. Ideally, that's up votes from quality people.

    Lacie: Quality people?

    Hansen: High fours. Impress those up-scale folks, you'll gain velocity on your arc and there's your boost.

Related Articles