A movie with a brain hole. Using technology to enter the dream state to treat patients may be a great breakthrough in psychological therapy. If you can figure out the neural coding or infer the working mode of the patient's brain through brain waves, that is not a good thing for treatment. The disadvantage is that most of the mentally ill patients are very mentally strong and difficult to intervene, requiring the risk of professionals. From this film, it can be seen that in fact, many patients' moral concepts and principles of dealing with things are very different from those of ordinary people. The only similarity is that such principles are mostly motivated by "goodness". Because the injured bird will be eaten by force if it falls into the hands of Carl's father, then the ending will be even more tragic. In order to prevent it from being tortured even more, Carl has to kill it to avoid a more tragic tragedy. Tragedy sometimes acts as an end to an even worse tragedy. This statement is true to a certain extent, especially in the eyes of the mentally ill. After reading it, I don't know whether it is correct that Katherine chose to eliminate the evil part and finally made Carl die in a dream. Maybe, from a point of view, everyone has the right to live. For the little boy Carl, he wants to live, so he prays to Catherine to save him. For Catherine, the evil side has been tormenting Carl. For Catherine, perhaps eliminating the evil side, even if Carl dies, is to save him. In short, everyone has their own ideas and principles of dealing with things, so empathy is very important. However, in real life, we, who should be successfully socialized, need a set of principles that make order work in society.
View more about The Cell reviews
