In my opinion, this movie is undoubtedly a bad movie, the characters are black and white, the motives are confusing, and the plot is driven by coincidence. Now this film is only brought out because the theme is in line with the current situation, but not all disaster films that satirize the government and show human nature are good films, at least the director performed these poorly.
On the government side, since the outbreak of the virus, a series of measures have really taken a decisive step, directly shutting down the city, and resolutely strangling the virus in its cradle. It's much more resolute than the government's decision to seal the city and give notice. Isn't it bad to gather people together to control them and let them stay at home by themselves, because they are afraid that they will not riot? In addition, it is too decisive for the infected. It is not long after the virus broke out, and the infection is directly burned without trying to cure it? It really implements the spirit that as long as people die, the virus will not spread. The characters in it are very simple, and the comparison between the cold-blooded second-in-command and the kind-hearted first-in-command is carried out.
Some of the plots in it do reflect part of human nature, for example, in order to protect the mother who concealed the child, the gray area where she can go out for 20 million yuan, and the irrational person after losing a loved one. But I can't stand the nonsense of the plot. Is direct blood transfusion of antibody serum useful? With so many recovered patients now, shouldn't the pneumonia be resolved sooner? This male protagonist is also a living Bodhisattva, calling me a member of the rescue team, then staring at the door and smashing, trying to release the infected person, is this saving people or spreading the virus? A person walks in and out of the dead man's land without being infected. Someone else's mask fell off for a moment and was directly attacked. This protagonist's halo is too powerful. This IQ insulting plot washes away the satire of the government and the reality of the display of real human nature.
The disaster movie is a fictional thought test, but the director wanted both commerciality and realistic irony, and the result was a tragic mix of Korean love, Hollywood heroism, and real irony. In the end, only the self-climax of anti-US imperialism and anti-government for the Korean people is left.
Real disaster films often look at problems from different perspectives. For example, in "Blood Epidemic", they look at the same problem from the perspective of a doctor and the perspective of the upper class, showing different levels of worry when making decisions. people think. Not the cold-blooded government, the selfish mother's love, the living Bodhisattva with the brain on the sperm, and the crazy mob.
View more about Flu reviews
