After reading a lot of comments, I think everyone is too...
1. The elements described in the film, including Mycroft earning money to support a family, emphasizing their own value, and other elements such as feudal patriarchal thoughts and lady training schools, are all products of the historical background of the film, and are the background of the introduction of the story. I didn't think it was just a critique of irony.
2. The mother Sherlock Holmes described in the film tried to increase her influence by creating violent incidents with female groups to obtain women’s voting rights. In the end, she relied on her daughter to carry out what only men could do in the patriarchal society. "High-level" work, and various "very movie" plot developments, finally won women's voting status. My mother can't do the explosion. Isn't it true that gender equality is not achieved by physical force? Is it also advocating the legitimate advancement of status and rights through peaceful means such as the rule of law and procedures?
3. In my opinion, some fighting scenes clearly express the physical differences between men and women. The existence of weakness in physical abilities such as physical strength does not mean that the competition will eventually fail because of these weaknesses. However, women should also be soberly aware of the existence of this difference, avoid this natural disadvantage when gender wrestling, and outsmart it is not a good idea. Of course, the film also expresses that the gap in force may not be universal, and the ability to survive may not be stronger for men (the black woman who teaches martial arts).
4. After the male protagonist’s father got cold, family women, including mothers and grandmothers, did not hesitate to kill their sons and grandchildren in order to avoid women’s voting rights. This fully explains the root cause of the low status of women and the obstacles to the realization of women’s rights are not men. Groups, but classes, are those with vested interests.
5. The roles of Sherlock and the male lead in the film support the promotion of women's social status from the perspective of equality between men and women. Sherlock slowed down every step of her sister's step, and her abilities might not have been really low. Of course, she might not be an expert to guide her sister to achieve her goals in this way. I think the suspense deliberately created by the director is quite good. This is the equality of men and women, not necessarily which side should be weakened. In my opinion, what is preached is not to allow feminism to oppose men one-sidedly. Different genders are not the biggest obstacle to women's rights, or even the main obstacles.
6. The film finally hints that equality between men and women has a long way to go, but it is improving.
Of course, I really don’t understand if I want to sprinkle what persuasive way, what plot design movie shooting skills, screenwriting ability, etc., I just watch the excitement. It is true that those who use refrigerators do not need to be able to make refrigerators, but it is also inappropriate to say which wire is incorrectly connected through the refrigerator shell?
But for the work, you have to allow both Yangchun Baixue and Xia Liba people to exist. No, it’s not that Nolan’s kind of incomprehensible movie is called a good movie. This kind of movie is not so profound, it is a movie that everyone can understand, and it can spread positive energy. It's pretty good, isn't it?
View more about Enola Holmes reviews
