I was looking forward to this film from the beginning, after all, all the actors liked it,
But facts have proved that when good actors and good directors gather together, it is not necessarily a good movie. The same goes for Hua Mulan.
Let’s talk about the advantages first, don’t look like I’m mean
One star is of course given to the actors. Xiao 11 is very good. I like that kind of perverse feeling. She is very suitable to play Aunt Hai’s daughter, because the perverse feeling is really in the same line. Aunt Hai and Aunt May (the aunt in Harry Potter haha) are exactly two neurotic extremes: extreme rebellion and extreme conservative. Two people contributed 70% of the show's excitement, Xiao11 gave 20%, and I am willing to give the rest to the grandmother. The actors are very suitable for the protagonist, but the acting skills are not suitable for the character. The son of the Marquis is really beautiful. When the beauty comes out, I think it is a vase, but later it proves that he is still a little clever boy, and he is a bit concealed by his beauty? The moment he jumped out of the window, I seemed to see the young plum. But he really couldn't play the aristocratic feeling and the cleverness that the character should have, so that I am convinced that he was finally dazzled by love and voted.
One-star way of telling the story, speaking to the camera has a sense of interaction with the audience, which is quite interesting, and the camera switching is also good, not very obtrusive (sequelae of "Creed"), good storytelling is better than anything else . The spelling process is also very clear. At least non-English proficient viewers like me don't need to go back and forth to see what spelling means. The whole viewing process is very smooth.
There is one more star. Actually I only want to give half star. I don’t know why the computer version can’t give half star... It’s a bit unexpected. I really didn’t expect the biggest villain to be the male protagonist’s grandmother, or I’m clichéd. It turns out that there are people who sacrifice their families for the so-called national tradition. Although this sacrifice is meaningless, I really didn't expect it from the three views of my good youth.
Okay, that’s all for good things, and I’ll start to spit out the output below.
First of all, from the beginning, I thought this film was about feminism. The heroine’s mother abandoned her family for the cause of feminism. How great, the heroine went to find her mother, and then made a little contribution to the cause of feminism. . As for the two elder brothers, it can be support or family resistance. The film also performed well in this regard. but! The screenwriter said, I don’t go this way! I am the feminist black who hides the deepest!
The female protagonist fell in love with the male protagonist (son of the Marquis) inexplicably because she jumped the bridge? Or is it love at first sight? Probably the latter, anyway, when she said that I like you, I was really more confused than the male protagonist: this is it?
Then I went to find my mother during the whole process, afraid that she had escaped without knowing the whole world? I'm really not surprised when Leitra found her, and I even dislike him for finding her too slowly. Although the heroine is naive, but naive is not stupid. I don't know what the world is like after reading so many newspapers and books?
I also don’t know if my mother taught the heroine so much martial arts, chemistry, and tennis. Obviously, I just want my daughter to go out to find you, so don't act like I want to protect my daughter very well.
Then my mother left, probably conspiring to blow up the dock, doing something big to attract people's attention to women's voting rights. This idea, made like a villain, clarifies the truth for world peace, and I want to stand with the conservative party. Women's rights are not terrorism, and there is no need for such extreme methods to express their demands. On the surface, the screenwriter wants to express that women are fighting for their rights. In the actual drama, the women are either conspiring to explode, or holding a teapot to make comparisons. There is no actual action at all, they are all paper tigers.
The female protagonist left herself in order to save the male protagonist. She was forced to send to the female ethics school by her elder brother. She relied on the male protagonist to rescue herself, and then sent the male protagonist home. She was shot by grandma beng. Thanks to her for saving herself, and then cast her inexplicable yes vote, in favor of women's voting rights.
That's it? ? ? ? ?
So Mary Su? ? ?
To put it bluntly, do you still have to rely on love to move the hero and then win this vote? ? ?
It’s better to let your mother go and fall in love with the male protagonist uncle, and have two votes in hand. ? ?
At the end, I was really speechless. I couldn't understand what the film wanted to express: feminism? Affection? love? None at all
In terms of women’s rights, the people fighting for did not show any seriousness, and the person who was led (the heroine) achieved the goal of the fight somehow.
In terms of family affection, my mother doesn’t want it, my brother doesn’t love it, and my grandmother wants to shoot you. It’s very indifferent.
In terms of love, just because of a train trip, the heroine feels that she has not saved the hero, so she falls in love after thinking about it day and night? Even if you look at the face, the male lead listened to the confession so many times, and finally said like a charterer, I want you to come to my house? So to say I like you so hard? Mary Su turned into a London renting story in the end?
In general, even if this is an article about Jinjiang Marie Su, it is not a good Marie Su, not to mention the feminist and Sherlock Holmes brand, whether it is the same or not, it doesn’t matter, just to attract attention, just It's the same as my title, but it's a pity that it's an actor.
View more about Enola Holmes reviews
