I was very happy watching it, and it made me happier than the other one recommended by everyone. The chemical reaction of the male and female leaders is very ok, interspersed, the two are independent but connected to each other.
Miss Holmes said that her last time her knees were frayed and almost died to save a lamb on the cliff, and when they arrived in London and the two were separated, the earl was also sitting in a car full of lambs. I don't care if the portrayal of feminism in this film is profound, whether it is thought-provoking or whether the reasoning is logically complete. I didn't think the characters were stereotyped or thin, and I didn't plan to use the quality of Sherlock's inference drama ip to require that the reasoning and feminism can be clearly separated in just two hours, and it is deep enough to cause people to wake up.
I just want to be happy.
The small details echo back and forth. The pampered earl has countless friends in the field. The false clues of the tree house and the steel plate worn when looking for a shark are all side descriptions of "not an idiot".
We only have each other, so I will come back to find you.
Sherlock is rare to have human feelings, and it is also commendable. Enola has the aura of a big heroine, but there is no annoying, clever little detective, but also a young girl who will throb.
I think the line of youth love is a wonderful addition, because it combines a part of the line of reasoning that is not very good.
I didn't pay too much attention to the portrayal of feminism. I had a good time watching it. I didn't intend to make a movie have a magical effect.
"When I saw the lamb, the lamb was going to die. I rubbed my knee and chose to save it because it was unable to save itself because of the circumstances, and I had this ability. 』
The story seems very idealistic and even has the meaning of savior, which is the character that routine female protagonists love to hear in the traditional sense.
But I really like her.
It's like a girl with a blue hairband at the beginning of the film riding a bicycle in the field, even the wind is free.
She is frank and lively and just and true.
The mother advocates whether to save after weighing the gains and losses. The basic requirement is to save oneself.
Enola thinks that in this situation I have the ability to help but do not, then the other party will die.
In my opinion, this is the enthusiasm of young people who have not been poured cold water. It can also be said to be reckless regardless of gains and losses. But only when I was young, I envied and admired the young people who did not put their interests in sacks and put them on the ends of the scales, and demanded themselves only by the justice of "it should be so".
Take the risk to desperate for the justice that the original was supposed to be.
I also like the conservative, even though he doesn't seem to be very clever, the earl.
What is rare in aristocratic families is everything that does not match the status of aristocrats. He knows all kinds of weird plants, will deliberately pretend to leave wrong information, will stupidly grasp the wrong key points, will give early warning and complain and be prepared.
After saying "but we have each other", she was forced to flee first, but she still remembered to come back to save her and hold her hand and said that she would go to London together.
Are we all abandoned?
But we have each other.
The fingers that hold back and the hug around the neck when out of the box are much sweeter than kiss.
Mushrooms and reeds are a natural pair.
View more about Enola Holmes reviews
