I opened the map and took a look at where Seven Hills is. It used to be next to Palma. I miss school. I used to go to the AMC in Palma next to Seven Hills to watch movies. Then I saw Downtown, and I saw the Keybank Building, the Municipal Building, and the CSU Building.
Most of the six episodes of this play focus on the first trial, and the retrial is mainly to see if there is any new evidence, so it is correct to put a lot of space in the first trial
As for the evidence inside:
1. First of all, the prosecution witnesses that all the victims are dizzy. If you can't remember your son's name, don't show up, especially if you have to meet Ivan confronting each other with confidence Song Kanghao doesn't do the same thing. He feels that the defense lawyers in this place can do more to strike the witness's credibility by belittling this naive point of view.
There is also a prosecution certification who said in the previous statement that he killed Ivan, which is contradictory. It is a prior inconsistent statement, which can easily be ruled out.
But the judge is too biased and can only say that he can't do neutral thinking, sowing the seeds for future revisions
2. The physical evidence is an ID card similar to a work permit. The documents are different from others and the photos are all posted later. How can you prove that the photo is Ivan himself? This kind of evidence that should be considered as contained evidence can be excluded, including height incompatibility. There is no excessive extension in the play. It is estimated that the judge also ignores it.
3 is line up. The witness was not identified at first sight during the identification, so it cannot be ruled out that the prosecutor may have induced a confession and should not be admitted.
It can only be said that the judge is preconceived and attacking the defense attorney O'Conner for being loud is totally unjustifiably interfering with the defense.
The standard of proof in criminal proceedings is higher than that in civil litigation, which means beyond a reasonable doubt that as long as there is a slight possibility that the defendant is not a criminal, the standard of proof has not been met. According to the principle of whoever claims, the prosecution should bear the adverse consequences of producing evidence.
But after returning to the US, he was stripped of his citizenship and then extradited to Germany to stand trial. It feels like a double Jeopardy violation. Israel doesn't hold you accountable. What's the matter with the US?
In the end, I still have to sigh with emotion. I used to work in a factory, which is similar to the male protagonist’s Ford factory, but in Solon, I feel that the employer said it well in the play. I went home and met a colleague called Ianku. Ianku Romanian said that at that time, those who opposed Ceausescu's asylum to the United States still had a kind of consciousness that China was a third world socialist camp.
View more about The Devil Next Door reviews
