Have you ever thought that when the superiors called the male protagonist to tell him that his wife was a spy, they were 200% sure that his wife was a spy, and asked him to come over and do the experiment? Just to test the hero, because they gave him a week-long time to observe what he did. If her wife did not send out this information, then the male protagonist will be over. Because it must be the male protagonist who told his wife not to post it. If she sends out information, but he doesn't do anything calmly, it is also very strange, because normal people are very anxious in this situation. As a result, he sent a big move and ran to France by himself, proving that he really didn't know. So they didn't punish him. It's scary after thinking about it for a moment, hahaha.
The above is quoted, this one clearly understands the truth.
Below is my understanding and complaints.
When the male protagonist saw Boss V, he gave him a close-up of the gun in the drawer. In other words, it’s okay to kill the male protagonist at that time. At that time, the boss of the male protagonist stood on the side very witty. Although the words helped him out, it was obvious that he didn't hurt the onlookers by mistake.
The choice of the male protagonist is to prove the innocence of the female protagonist, and to get away with it. In short, don't hang on to anyone, man, I still want to take my wife and children on the horse. As for whether or not to tell the heroine, it is completely unnecessary. Everyone is a fox for thousands of years, and no one should play the Liao Zhai.
The heroine's choice is one is to run if she can run, and the other is to commit suicide if she can't run so that her husband and children can survive. That's why there is a last letter to send and to my daughter, and I wrote my real name for future husbands, children and the audience to brainstorm.
It can be seen that these two are not given for nothing, and the decision-making is no problem. The second half of the plot can be considered to be developed with the knowledge of both husband and wife.
The plot starts with the male protagonist pulling the female protagonist to the bar to play Marseille to verify that he is right. Some details are quite interesting. For example, when the heroine whispered in tears and said, okay, when you see through the old lady, is the interpretation a deliberate performance as a senior spy or her inner turbulence, doubt and temptation, and the desire to wait for the hero to kill off the assembly line in the car but not return. To stay away, different people will have different interpretations for different experiences.
The boss of the male lead warned the male lead from the first appearance that you, grandson, want to play off the rhythm. Including all the later things, basically you just linger. Finally he showed up at the airport. Maybe this old boy would have to wait for the night at the airport. You kid, I brought you up, I don’t know your little moths yet. I know that you are innocent, but your wife must die, otherwise I myself and the entire department may get in.
What I want to complain about is that the film is very good in all aspects, and the intention is also very good. From a realistic perspective, it is too harsh to criticize the artistry of the script for being biased.
Finally, I want to say, in the real situation, whether this kind of thing will happen no one can pack a ticket. It is self-evident that the probability of a good death is extremely low.
Spies, especially female spies, female spies who are engaged in unspeakable missions, have already reached a state of disillusionment in the training stage, so stop making trouble if you have a love for children. So the director arranged for a daughter. With children, many things are different.
View more about Allied reviews
