who is right

Newell 2022-04-17 09:01:14

This film goes straight to the point. At the beginning, there is a dead person. The police hunt down the suspect. As a result, another person died, and the suspects became two. One suspect is a writer and one is a housewife. The police suspect that the writer killed his wife, ran away, went to the housewife, and killed the woman's husband. A writer speaks a story, a woman speaks another. The whole film focuses on who killed the woman's husband. First, it was determined that it was a writer, and the media were all convened. As a result, new clues appeared, so the previous conjecture was overturned. A new reporter came. The prototype of the character in the writer's book died. Her father came to report the crime, and he was very determined that the writer killed his daughter. But there's really no evidence. Then a lot of coincidences were discovered, and then the murderer was determined to be the woman and her lover, because there was no mud on her dead husband's shoes, and it was a rainy day, and his husband never went out when he got home, so it could only be a woman She was found to have an affair with her lover and killed her husband during an argument. It happened that the writer broke into her house, and then they knew that the writer was a fugitive who murdered his wife, and it was logical that they wanted to blame the writer. This set is really reasonable. But things didn't turn around until the end. The murderer is a writer. For the release of the book, he killed his wife, thinking that he would not be suspected if he reported the crime, but he ran away, and he happened to run to the woman's house. He saw what the woman wanted to hide, and then he killed the woman's husband who came home. , put the blame on the woman and her lover, he has seen their photos, so he knows what he looks like. Overall, the movie moves pretty fast. But if you think about it, you will find a lot of things that don't make sense. When the writer finally let it go, he said he did everything. That's when it was okay. If the writer is not the real murderer, then who killed his wife, how the prototype in the book died, and how the woman's husband died, everything would be messy, and he didn't want to do it. If everything is to make sense, the murderer has to be a writer. This movie really doesn't follow logic. The archetypal girl in the writer's book suffered a round x in reality. He originally promised her not to reveal her name, but for his own benefit, he leaked the girl's name. The girl was despised and sympathized by others, and she was already hurt. As a result, the girl was finally unable to hold back when she was stabbed with a knife. The reality is that the victim is often the object of most concern, it is obviously not her fault, and everyone should spurn those perpetrators, but the curiosity of people or the idea that girls must be chaste will always prevail, and then a chain reaction will occur. Human saliva is so powerful that no one can afford it. The girl's father went to the police and said that the writer had killed his daughter, but no one paid any attention to it for a long time, until the writer's wife died and needed the girl's father to provide information Asked, they came to ask. The girl's father said, now I help you, not you help me. I have said the same thing many times, but none of you listened. People are soft-spoken, and even if you think something important, as long as it doesn't touch on the bigger concerns, it is doomed to annihilation. There is not much evidence here, and all that is said is one mouth. During the interrogation process, I felt that I shouldn't ask this question, shouldn't I bomb it? The truth is not at all confusing. Just believe in a well-known writer, or a derailed woman, I believe there is an answer here. The writer is indeed a writer who writes suspense detectives. He has made up his own stories and can convince the most intelligent police detectives. The police detective finally knew the truth, but the writer had already left the country smoothly, how could he catch up, only red eyes, regret for life.

View more about Ittefaq reviews

Extended Reading
  • Jazmin 2022-04-19 09:03:20

    I finally saw an Indian film without singing and dancing. The ending was reversed well, but it was a little rushed. …

  • Ford 2022-04-24 07:01:27

    Such an ending makes one pay homage to the Indian film regulator.