This is a good movie. I applaud the 90-year-old Mr. Dongmu and his creative passion, but here I would like to talk about one of my thoughts on this movie: In fact, after watching it, we will investigate why Richard went from When heroes turn into criminals, what we pursue is about the prejudice of the entire American culture against people under a certain label (older singles who live with their mothers), about the loopholes in the American judicial system, and more about popular psychology and human nature...etc. broader social issues. For realist themes, the cause of the story can be accidental, but the more inevitable the force that pushes the story forward, the more profound the story will leave people to think about. For example, in "I'm Not the God of Medicine", the conflict between the prescription (or the police) and the cancer patient is triggered, not because of the good or bad of a certain character, nor because of who's luck is particularly good or bad, but because— - "Poverty Diseases" of the Common People: Poverty is the original sin. Although the dying patients are pitiful, we can't find anyone to pay for the high medical expenses. Conflicts between pharmaceutical companies and patients are inevitable, and audiences will also pursue the current or future solution to this social problem. However, in this film, because the main characters of Richard's opposite are "very superficial", I, as an audience, will think that if he is facing an honest FBI detective and an objective reporter, maybe he will will not encounter such a predicament. For works of this kind of realistic theme, if the contingency of the core force that drives the conflicting direction of the story increases by one point, then the heavy feeling of the film will be reduced by one point, and our reflection on the social status quo will be reduced by one point.
View more about Richard Jewell reviews
