After reading the ratings, many people gave it three points. In fact, it is understandable. When I just watched it, I thought the first part of the movie was not bad, but the ending was just so-so.
Some people also say that if the truth is not told at the end, it may be a masterpiece, and some agree with this view (provided that there are a few clues for the male protagonist's fine points. At present, it seems that there is only one clue that the gas station cashier and the person in charge of the hospital are the same person. , this is hard evidence! Other vague clues will not be mentioned)
At the beginning, I also wanted to play three points, because I would compare it with the gods such as lethal id, and it is indeed a little worse than the gods. But is there really that much difference?
I started to look back on the movie, maybe a bit over-interpreted, and I finally decided that the movie couldn't be lower than a 4.
Reason 1: The rhythm, why do we watch movies, because the time is short, it is not as time-consuming as TV dramas, to attract the audience's attention in a short time, it needs a tense and exciting rhythm, this movie absolutely does it, without delay. This is easy to say, and there are several directors who can do it well.
Reason 2: Atmosphere, the gloomy atmosphere of the whole movie is really in line with the precise setting of the male protagonist. Maybe in the eyes of a schizophrenic patient, the world is so gloomy, and it feels like everyone is hurting you.
Reason 3 Director, the above two points are all interpretations of the director's ability. I also want to say that the director's character is also good, at least I like it better. First of all, the storytelling is not cryptic at all.
I believe that many viewers feel this way when they watch the movie. When they feel that the male lead is right, they firmly believe that the male lead is right, and when they feel that the hospital is right, they firmly believe that the hospital is right. Because the director did not give too many distractions, the audience felt that this movie was special Easy to understand.
It's not like some movies are tricky and convoluted, which makes the audience almost understand. At the end, the director was very kind and gave the truth of the story. Let the audience stop here, the ok process is tense, the truth of the ending is revealed, what should the audience do, no need to think, and the movie ends.
But it is also for this reason that many viewers who are experienced in watching suspense films feel that alas, as I thought, they had already guessed the ending.
So as I mentioned earlier, if you don't give the truth, you should give more clues to the truth. In the end, many viewers will join the discussion and research on whether the male protagonist is precise or not. It is difficult to say whether the movie will become a miracle, but it will definitely attract more attention to the movie.
The director didn't do that, he just wanted to tell a story honestly. I like this treatment. In this era of mysteries, hype, and eye-catching, his approach may be really precious.
Personal views welcome discussion.
View more about Fractured reviews
