E2 The entire trial was emotional and full of mysteries. Still can't be sure. But where would a normal person have that look when they were identified as the most evil of all? That pent-up smugness and enjoyment of the survivors' painful memories. But isn't this my imagination? The survivors' recollections are confusing and heartbreaking, but what about the truth? In the absence of more solid evidence, who can comfort these people? But was this demon a demon in the first place? Is he also another victim?
The evidence from the E3 photos is indeed puzzling. And the hidden evidence in the end is even more suspicious. For such a shocking case, the manipulation behind the US government, and the unexplained help of the Soviet Union, one has to wonder, is it all for the sake of the flickering political situation? Or does each party have different demands? Back to the case itself, this time the suspect showed excitement for the first time. He posted all the letters from his supporters in the small cell, and he recorded the address of each letter. "I only want justice, I have nothing against anyone," he said. It cannot be denied that these words may have come from a lawyer's request, but it still moved me. The Ukrainian community is trying to help him because they are afraid that they will end up like this, but if he is really Ivan, how can he get away with this, or if we don't pursue the truth, how will we treat those dead The poor man who escaped? How on earth are we going to face those beasts of war, after we know he's a new law-abiding citizen? On the other hand, when people are angry, how can we be rational? How professional? How not to "show" a benevolent face?
In the end, that fake certificate, splattered on a few pages, is the dignity of those survivors, who feel guilty for their own survival, because they are lucky in their misfortunes. I looked at the witness's aged body and tears of pain, how could I bear to blame? As a survivor, it turned out to be such a tangle and pain. They struggle with past nightmares and real guilt. Damn fascists!
The first evidence of reversal in E5 is surprising. The final trial in Germany has always remained in the fog. Whether or not John is the devil seems to never be certain. Every "hard" evidence is something people want to believe. Still have some thoughts and questions.
When there is no conclusive evidence, do we, as the general public, pursue the truth or choose a position? When people hear an acquittal, the pain is palpable, but because of that, can the masses have a choice over individuals? Which is better, wrongful conviction or manslaughter?
Whether the people who participated in this ruthless massacre are also victims of the war, it seems so natural for them to protect themselves under the choice of life and death. However, with 30,000 innocent lives reduced to ashes in the gas chamber, how can those who flip the switch be innocent? Is hatred blinding our eyes, or reason makes us hesitant? If every participant is a sinner, it is true justice to judge them all. In the United States, it was introduced that John hid other Nazis. This is the real irony.
In the end, many people no longer care about the truth, but to prove their choice. I feel that John is just a puppet that the United States pretends to be humane in order to hide itself, but actually absorbs the "good Nazis". Everyone is fiddled with politics and economics in the fog.
At the end, there is a blank section of the monument of the concentration camp, which cannot but be thought-provoking. What is the meaning of the law? What will happen to those unrelieved pains in the progress of civilization? How can we ensure the truth rather than go to the pitiful position of proving a position when we are trying to dig out of the quagmire beneath the vast expanse of whiteness?
War, please never happen again.
View more about The Devil Next Door reviews
