First of all, we must be sure that the director, even from God's perspective, is implying that what our male protagonist is saying is not true, such as the description of the male protagonist by the father of the female student who committed suicide; Different.
Then we have to convince ourselves to accept three settings: First, the male protagonist receives a text message at the hotel and wants to kill the second person, and goes to the victim's house after overturning. It is also said to be a coincidence); second, this apartment and your turn apartment are of the same type, not only there is no camera inside, but there is also no camera outside, so to judge the male victim when he gets home, he can't look at the nearby cameras, only if there are any shoes on the soles. The third is that the police assumed that it was two people killed by one person, but they would not investigate the relationship between the two victims and the perpetrator, and directly believed that the second case was a temporary murder case.
Even so, it's hard to believe that the police will conclude the wrong case: if the male protagonist is right, the two will kill the dead together. How did the man escape from the apartment where the police had already entered? Is it that easy to get away with it? They dragged the deceased. Did the deceased have skin abrasions on their backs? Wouldn't force (moving) on a corpse that may have started to corpse leave no marks?
On the other hand, if what the woman said about the murder of her lover is true, then it means that the male victim was killed when the heroine ran to call for help and ran back again. So, is the deceased still cold at this time? ! Can it be rescued again? ! ! ! This kind of instant death forensic doctor must say that he died at 8-12? ! ! ! Is this spicy chicken? ? ! ! !
So this movie tells us that for suspense to crime, try not to write about the crime process that takes a long time and has many interactions, otherwise you can't explain why you can leave him and go to the kitchen with a flashlight instead of a knife; why leave him in the bathroom Eye control instead of a razor and other sharp tools, just a flashlight to take a photo; why my lover has no way to convey the information that he is in danger when he arrives at the door, but really wants to send him away; why the first and last time to escape the door Don't know how to call for help, tonsillitis? !
Also, the classic inspiration is from irrelevant things to criminal situations (look at the Reaper Schoolboy), what kind of shit is this final "I won't tell you he died of a drug overdose" prompt , the audience will not think that you are awesome, but will only think "I rubbed and I thought you ruled out this reason and let him go. You didn't even measure the drug concentration, what's the trouble."
So this story also tells us, don't think that Rashomon's story is good when it's used badly.
Finally, I would like to thank the director again for always emphasizing how unreliable the Indian case investigators are. Every time I question the logic of the case, I can accept it when I think of it, which is very caring.
PS: If the director's ability is not enough, don't add too many extra shots, this is not a foreshadowing, it is a trick.
View more about Ittefaq reviews
