I just watched it, and I was a little emotional, thinking about what to say.
1. This man is the real "Ivan the Terrible". Not to mention the evidence and the testimony of the survivors (one more thing, in my opinion, their testimony is the most powerful evidence, what can make multiple survivors testify perjury on this matter at the same time to frame a strange old man ? Impossible), let's just say that the expression and performance of Drew Yangmick (Dru below) during the whole process can completely feel that he is definitely Ivan. Imagine if he was really an ordinary person, he would act like that Is the behavioral mindset going through all this? The show, kissing the earth, shaking hands with survivors, pretending to be sick, calling yourself a hero is disgusting.
2. Sheffield and Drew's son-in-law and other relatives are the biggest accomplices (only the individual level, not the government). Especially this son-in-law, who has no brains to believe him without knowing Drew at all? Do you work harder than your own children to help him file a lawsuit? I don't believe it when he says he has no other purpose. At the end of the interview with Drew's grandson, he basically implicitly admitted that he believed that Drew was Ivan, but he felt that it was not important, and it was not Drew's fault, saying that in that case he could only do this, he did not Others do it, you do it, and I do it too. EXM? So why did Ivan get the title of this Terrible Thunder Emperor? Why do you say he is the most murderous executioner in human history? He not only manipulated the gas chambers, but also tortured and abused the Jews in an extremely inhuman way for fun. Is this something anyone would do? I can't help but think of the Nanjing Massacre.
3. In fact, there are political game factors in the whole process of the incident. At first, it was said that the Soviet Union was a countermeasure to prevent the anti-Soviet groups in the United States from uniting. Later, it was said that the Nazi war criminals who consciously let go of these immigrants were the Nazi war criminals. In order to use their skills, knowledge, productivity and anti-communism (that's why I say those things that the US imperialists preach all day long are jokes, they are the norm for other countries, and they have no restrictions on themselves). In my opinion, the former is no longer a fact (on the basis that Drew is Ivan), while the latter is real. This shows that the U.S. imperial government disregarded humanitarianism for its own development and strength, and deliberately condoned war criminals; At the same level, many people in the film also think that it is meaningless to pursue things that happened decades ago. Just let it go is also ignoring humanitarianism. I just want to say bullshit, if one day their nation suffers the same thing, I hope their descendants can smile and say go with the wind in a few decades.
4. Continuing with point 3, I think that forgetting the massacre and condoning war criminals is more inhumane than massacre, because first of all, this is another injury to the survivors, and it is a spiritual injury, and secondly, this will inevitably lead to massacres Play it again in the future.
5. In the end, Ivan lived to the age of 91 and died in a sanatorium with a clean body. This is the best destination for him, and it is also the most cruel injury to all the souls of his men and the survivors. Please learn from history and don't let this happen again.
View more about The Devil Next Door reviews
