Not a film review, purely to record personal feelings

Dillon 2022-03-22 09:02:43

It's a film that I want to watch again and analyze well (from a political point of view, not about film technique)

The film (in part) shows the terrifying power that technology can have - changing the political landscape. The general public is unaware that their ideas are being directed in a particular direction. Certain words are constantly being repeated, and certain ideas are gradually being rooted in some people's minds. A lie repeated 10,000 times becomes the truth. Small dots are infinitely magnified and repeated infinitely, and they become the object of people's indignation and the "fact" they believe in. The same is true for Taobao, Weibo, etc. algorithms, recommending things that meet your preferences, thus greatly limiting the scope of choice and thinking, and reducing diversity. In this case, everyone who is willing to be bound by it or who does not realize that he is bound is enjoying himself in the enclosure. It's ridiculous that these people think they own the whole world, but they're just frogs in the bottom of the well.

Compared with the deep-seated social problems in the UK that Brexit has revealed, it is one of the most alarming parts. Compared with this, politics seems to be something more superficial, a means of conspirators. At the symposium (?) organized by the Remain Party, people from the initial indifference to the final quarrel and roar revealed the real situation of part of the British lower class. Racial issues, life issues, immigration issues, personal wishes... Every society has chronic diseases and scars that cannot be easily opened. Usually, most people carefully turn a blind eye or deliberately avoid them. At this moment, everyone has to make (Probably) when it comes to the choice of vital interests, all care is thrown away, all the things that have been hidden are spread on the table, everyone tore their faces, denounce everything they think is their own, screaming desperately, It seems that the louder the voice, the more reasonable it is.

All societies with a past cannot abandon the past.

When Dom said I miss sleep, he couldn't help but think of the stolen sleep in "Macbeth", is there a metaphor here?

When the MP's death happened, I felt that Gove and Dom were both a little shocked. They didn't expect things to develop to this point, completely beyond their expectations. I think at that time they should have been doubtful and shaken about what they were doing. When Gove and Dom met in the pub, it can be said that the words are very real. He seems to be asking not only Dom, but also all Brits and all of us watching the movie. These are troubling and thought-provoking questions.

Gove said to Dom, you can't control it either. A prophecy. From the current point of view, the development of Brexit is not expected by anyone.

What's the voice Dom has been hearing?

At the end of the film, it is a little surprising to point out that among the Brexiters, not only AggregationIQ(?), but also Cambridge Analytica, which Dom chose, is included. It turns out that Big Data is the general trend. Later, it was said that Cambridge Analytica participated in the election of Donald Trump, which was unexpected and reasonable. It’s just that this can’t help but make people terrified: in such a leading democratic country, true popular election seems to be impossible, and voters are remotely controlled to make choices that meet the interests of certain politicians. If this continues, where will democracy go?

The story continues to unfold.

View more about Brexit reviews

Extended Reading

Brexit quotes

  • Dominic Cummings: [scene cuts between the two offices of Vote Leave and Vote Remain as they write out strategy] We also know that the other side are gonna run a campaign the way that campaigns have been run for pretty much the last 70 years. They're gonna fight from the center, and they're gonna make it about jobs and the economy.

    Andrew Cooper: We focus on the economy and jobs. The message: leaving risks both.

    Craig Oliver: Clinton '92. Best campaign ever. "It's the economy, stupid".

    Andrew Cooper: You define your opponent as the riskier option, and though the change candidate might initially poll well, come election day the nerves kick in. Voters revert back to center. Law of political science - if the status quo are ahead before the campaign begins, which we are, they always win on the day. So...

    Douglas Carswell: So, what's our answer?

    Dominic Cummings: Tzu's "The Art of War". If we fight them on home terrain, they will win. So what we need to do is lead them to the ninth battlefield. The deadly ground where no one expects to find themselves. Outcome? *They* perish.

    Victoria Woodcock: Which means?

    Dominic Cummings: You reverse the proposition. We make *them* the risky option. To stay is to risk losing more of the things we cherish - we're asking voters not to reject the status quo, but to return to it, to independence. How much does it cost us each week to be members of the EU?

    Daniel Hannan: In the region of...

    Dominic Cummings: What's our researcher's name?

    Matthew Elliott: Richard.

    Dominic Cummings: Ricardo, will you get me all the figures up for how much it costs to be members of the EU for a week? Largest one wins.

    Matthew Elliott: Make sure it's verifiable!

  • Dominic Cummings: It's not rocket science, it's simple. There are three types of voter. Those certain to vote to exit, that's one third. Well, they're in the bag, so ignore them. Those certain to vote to stay, that's another third, and we can't touch them so fuck 'em. The last third: "I would like to leave, but I'm worried about what the effect will be to jobs and living standards". *These* are the only people that we need to care about. And trust me, the others will be after exactly the same bunch.

    [cut to Vote Remain offices]

    Craig Oliver: Now, these are who will decide the result. The "Hearts versus Heads" and the "Disengaged Middle". 34% of the electorate.