untitled

A typical Hollywood thriller B-movie. The characteristics of Hollywood make the film full of familiar plots, character settings and ending trends, such as the process of the protagonist's introduction into the devil's lair, the type of characters who accompany the protagonist's dead ghosts, and the final transformation of the protagonist from good to evil. Shadows can be found in films of the same type; the characteristics of B-grade films make it the greatest purpose to stimulate people's optic nerves and gastric nerves, and use lenses, music, blood plasma and screams to arouse the perverted excitement in the audience's hearts, Just nothing new.

People who don't like this kind of movie naturally won't watch it, and those who like it really don't need to add such a mediocre production with no features to the movie catalog. That said, I don't see the value of this film's existence. If I watch this kind of movie for the first time, I might be scared or disgusted. Unfortunately, this assumption does not hold. After watching two or three films of this kind, you can sum up the rules, not to mention that many people have long been tired of reviewing them. Even a context like Eastern Europe doesn't give it any more meaning. If someone insists on summarizing the Cold War mentality or hooking up with topics such as human rights, I can only express helplessness.

Reading other people's comments, the first one seems to be good, but this second one has given me the idea to watch the series again. Where can it be better? !

View more about Hostel: Part II reviews