Forgive my ignorance, I still don't know the Peter Rabbit story, so I can say that my entire understanding of Miss potter comes from this movie, and I think the success of this movie is also because it made me wait for Muggle Writers of fairy tales and even British children's literature have developed a strong interest. By the way, if Chen Kaige's new work "Mei Lanfang" can make foreigners who know nothing about Peking Opera, or some Chinese who know nothing about Peking Opera, start to want to know about Peking Opera and this master, then Chen Kaige will also It can be regarded as infinite merit. Of course, if he can really shoot the "Plum Soul" as the propaganda says, then he can really boast that he is a master.
Back on topic, talk about Miss Potter. In the film, she is a natural artist. When she was a child, she could see her paintings come to life, and the rabbits and ducks she painted started to talk to herself. In this case, two consequences are prone to occur. Either she Crazy, or she has become an artist, and she has become an artist, or else say "you can't live without being crazy"! When she grows up, she still has the ability to communicate with nature, but those who are actually degenerating think she is very unreasonable, such as Miss Potter's mother, such as most publishers. Under the unbelievable gaze of others, Miss Potter was celibate into her 30s, and she was accompanied by her stories and paintings all day long, until she met Norman, a young publisher... In the end, Norman died, and Miss Potter She also bid farewell to the hustle and bustle of London and devote herself to the nature that truly belongs to her.
Miss Potter's ability to communicate with nature, with her own mind, and with her childlike ability to communicate with me is beyond my reach. I think it probably belongs only to Miss Potter, right? I hope that one day we can also open up our dusty imaginations.
In fact, the story of the movie is very bland, even including the death of Norman, but I don't think I will feel bored for a second in the 100 minutes of watching the movie. I am not a professional film student, so I can't say why this happens from a very theoretical point of view, but As a movie fan, I can feel the sincerity of the main creators. They did not make the plot very tense, they just filmed at the end of the historical facts (what the director said), and did not deliberately strengthen the dramatic conflict in a conventional way, but did a good job in every detail of the film, such movie fans can feel its sincerity of.
One of the highlights of the film is the details of how Miss Potter interacts with her paintings. Here, the director has handled the animation very well, which is concise, smart, cute, and full of childlike imagination. It is no wonder that director Chris Noonan's debut "Little Pig Baby" eleven years ago is a classic that makes you want to cry. Cartoons, although they are 2G animations, are more soothing than all general mobilizations.
Needless to say, Renée Zellweger's excellence and self-confidence, as an Americon dog, dared to play a legendary British female writer is enough to explain. After all, she has the experience of two "BJ's Single Diary", so she still has a basic understanding of the UK, but maybe BJ has impressed us too deeply, or BJ's influence on Renée Zellweger is too great, in short When I was Miss Potter, I saw a lot of BJ's shadows, such as movements, smiling faces, eyes, etc. I think although Miss Potter was a feminist at the time, it was Victorian period after all, with my ignorant historical common sense Imagine that Miss Potter should probably be a little more elegant than Renée Zellweger's performance. But I still regret that Renée Zellweger was not nominated for the Oscar for this film. Her performance was enough to be nominated for an Academy Award. As for the award, I think Miss Potter is after all the people of Her Majesty the Queen.
After watching the movie, I wondered, what kind of people are British people? We often say English gentlemen, but English football hooligans gentlemen? We often say that the British are serious and old-fashioned, but can you say that "The Lord of the Rings" is old-fashioned? Is Harry Potter old-fashioned? Is Miss Potter old-fashioned? It's the same in other countries. Can you imagine that the old Russian woman with the big five and the three rough is likely to be a ballet dancer when she was young? I think that people are individual, and we can only analyze individual cases and cannot make generalizations. Therefore, the so-called "post-80s" and "fifth generation" are very unreliable.
View more about Miss Potter reviews
