Although many things are complicated but there is no difference in essence, I still remember when the subordinates reported the plot summary to Diana: the role of the law school has a stubborn and benevolent former supreme judge, a doctor, a beautiful female graduate student and a local talented but sometimes An opportunistic prosecutor; the role of the policewoman includes a benevolent and stubborn deputy police officer who is always pressured by the chief, a strong alcoholic detective who believes that women should stay in the kitchen honestly, and a smart and beautiful anti-feminist Young policewoman; there is a stubborn and benevolent editor who talks about investigative reporters... It seems habitual. The boss is generally stubborn, but also benevolent. As long as he is not a big boss, how else the protagonist will use his hands and feet. The stubbornness is to set off the protagonist. Let the protagonist go to reform. The conflict between the characters, the compromise and integration, and how much integration is the plot. There is no difference.
The pressure of life may be because of the Diana in the film-we are a generation who grew up watching TV and the Internet, thinking that reality is just like what is shown on TV, or that we understand real life from TV and regard reality as TV. (There is a strong breath of yy suddenly) Lost the ability to feel and express emotions. Being confused, evading, and searching between the real and structured world, and being timid to hurt others with sharp words or indifferent or indifferent to let others leave, live in their own small world, and reluctant to leave. I resist change in my heart, and sometimes accept it on the surface, but in the end I still don’t want to change.
Having faith makes people feel at ease. Howard in the film thinks that there is a voice asking him to say, and he was later brainwashed by boss Jason as a belief to continue to say, no matter what, he feels at ease, (although crazy), he tells the facts and speaks the voice of the people, at least he lives You have to firmly believe that you are right and not be at a loss for decadence and waste. In some ways it also inspired others. Of course, this also made me think of "Gulliver's Travels", where the author used the protagonist Gulliver to satirize reality and finally took the protagonist as the object of satire. So whether Howard’s shaping is the same is a matter of opinion, I think there are similarities. The director or screenwriter used Howard’s words to point out that we are crazy and can’t stand this anymore; economic depression; inflation; food is not suitable for eating; violence occurs frequently and people go from anger at first to becoming accustomed to later; people should act; In the end, Howard saw God and promoted business transactions is undoubtedly inconsistent with the previous words and deeds. By the way, Jason’s positioning of business is actually reasonable. The world is indeed an ecosystem in terms of economy, with cycles and survival of the fittest. Economic globalization makes it easier for multinational companies to obtain benefits.
Although the times have changed and concepts have always changed, people's psychology is difficult to change. The instinctual behaviors that have been cultivated since ancient times are deeply rooted in human reason. Driven by the hands of the living environment and the background of the times, instinctive behaviors are more or less manifested, so our ways of facing things are often the same.
View more about Network reviews
