[Film Review] Dr. No (1962) 6.4/10

Brody 2021-11-14 08:01:22

The inaugural movie of the James Bond franchise, Terence Young's DR. NO sets the general tone and constitution of our beloved spy thriller, from its Maurice Binder designed, polka dots adorned main title sequence, its proverbial auditory theme, classic catchphrases like “Martini, shaken not stirred", "My name is Bond, James Bond.", to Bond's raffish personality and his penchant for never allowing any carnal pleasure slip through his fingers during his precarious missions, and a small handful of Bond girls whose loyalty and fate might differ, but nonetheless, are all sexy symbols who have no moral oscillation to come across in front of such a specimen of gentleman, oozed with equal quantity of danger and appeal.

As a paradigm entertainment establishing the West's nonpareil supremacy and superiority over the rest of the world, the franchise's first outing is set in Kingston, Jamaica, where a Chinese-German criminal scientist, the titular Dr. No (Wiseman) has built a secret base operated with radioactive matters, and whose agenda is to sabotage USA's Project Mercury. Sent to investigate the disappearance of a MI6 chief, Bond, deferential towards his superior M (Lee), takes the mission in stride, and is capable of smelling any funny business at short notice, even when facing a pestilent tarantula, he is phlegmatic enough to bide his time to turn the tables.

The impact of the iconic scene of a bikini-clad Honey Ryder (Andress) emerging from the sea wears off considerably for its pure female exploitation and unsparing male gaze, not that Connery is too niggardly to show off his well-built physique, only the fact that Honey doesn't contribute anything to the plot is gnawingly sexist and patriarchal, she is advised by Bond to keep silent, carted away unceremoniously when Bond and Dr. No finish their cornball small talk and start to mean business.

Not that ethnic characters are treated with sizable respect or felicity, John Kitzmiller's local ally Quarrel is the unsung hero with equal moxie but less fortunate kismet (and who can not tell a souped-up tank from a dragon); Wiseman's Dr. No comes rather late on the scene and whose menacing guise plummets immediately into a laughing stock in a jiffy, when all he wants to do is to recruit Bond to the vile SPECTRE organization, it is really not worth the fuss for a mastermind of his caliber.

Grandstanding a rushed but functional action-packed climax, DR. NO might be the best outcome borne out of its very modest budget, but it does strike gold by finding a strapping leading man who hasn't yet been hardened by the cynical nature of espionages and endless treachery under the pall of the Cold War, and Connery, is the ultimate coolth of any heterosexual man's consummate ideal, who can always have his cake and eat it too.

referential entries: Guy Hamilton's GOLDFINGER (1964, 6.3/10); Sam Mendes' SPECTRE (2015, 6.3/10); Terence Young's WAIT UNTIL DARK (1967, 7.4/10).

View more about Dr. No reviews

Extended Reading
  • Dagmar 2022-03-16 09:01:03

    As the first film of 007, the plot of this film is protracted and boring. In the back, it is completely watching the scenery and the seascape. This is a 6-year-old film, and I dare to say that it was influenced by other people, but this film is no more interesting than North by Northwest, the essence of others has not been learned at all, it is just a little visual fur, Connelly is very rude to women !

  • Vaughn 2022-04-21 09:01:45

    The first generation of Bond is very cold-hearted detective. I think the latest Bond is a return to this cold-hearted style to a certain extent.

Dr. No quotes

  • [Professor Dent tries to kill Bond, but his gun is out of bullets]

    James Bond: That's a Smith & Wesson and you've had your six.

    [Bond shoots Dent twice]

  • James Bond: Tell me Miss Trench, do you play any other games?