I haven't read the best-selling original book, so I don't have a clue as to what many people say about the theory that the book doesn't fit the screenplay. From a purely cinematic point of view, many scenes in this play have a huge sense of suspense, and the director is deliberately creating a neurotic atmosphere. Especially at the end of the film, when Joe nervously rushed to the street and went straight to Claire's house, there was a silent slow motion shot, and then a shoulder shot in the form of a handheld. The whole layout made the audience and the protagonist experience an urban distress together. Compared with the mutual "barrel" of you and me, I think, it is more convincing to use this kind of side foil to express the tense nerves. From the very beginning, we can see the actions and words of the male protagonist who keep repeating. It is undeniable that the expressions and actions of the actors are the soul of the whole movie. You can see from it that rational people live like this. Hard. Professor Joe is a person who pays attention to rational basis in everything. Will there be few such people around us? The vision of society is: emotional people are prone to mistakes, rational people have self-discipline. However, the movie has been subverting this inherent concept, rational people are the time bomb that is easy to go crazy completely. We have to ask why in everything. Comrade Joe Joe is so perverted that he even asks why we "love". He even asks himself over and over again, why do we have sexual intercourse, and then why do we have children, because of what? These things are naive and crazy, but the more rational people, the more they can’t understand, maybe this world has too many reasons for combining, some people are because of money, some people are because of power, but you can hide the role of love. What? That's the biggest motivation for you to do all kinds of crazy things. Like that poor Jack, he was imagined by us to be a lunatic, a revenge person, a perverted stalker, but have you ever thought about it, and have you set him simply For a guy who is desperate for the one he loves?
When I was watching the movie, I really fell into this trap. I tried desperately to imagine the identity of this perverted homosexual. Is it the doctor's old lover? Is it a person who is crazy because of love? It turned out that my guesses were all wrong. If Jack's gender was changed, we would naturally associate her as a love at first sight, and would pay all the price for what we loved, and finally set out on a path of no return due to jealousy Poor girl, just because of a gender issue and, of course, the actor's excellent staring horror performance, we have misunderstood the simple meaning of the character's existence. It is as sad as the wife who thinks she knows her husband very well, but always misunderstands that her husband has an extramarital affair. It is because we are also victims of rationality, and we are used to using logic to restrain our casual thinking. Without the suspicion between people, we can't get the so-called enduring love.
The end of the film echoes the beginning of the film, but, later, they began to discover the beauty of speechlessness. In fact, that's what happened. We are not passively waiting for his results, but when it comes, it really does. It's just so natural. It doesn't need so many reasons. Reason is often the beginning of thinking and sin. Let us believe in our hearts, so that we are worthy to pursue eternal love.
View more about Enduring Love reviews
