the direction of the police is fundamentally wrong. The murderer is someone else, or many people imitate the killing, but they are not of concern to the police. This statement makes sense, so I won’t explain much here.
The second kind of understanding: The murderer was Xiao Bailian (Park Hung Kyu), and the DNA was left by the wretched man (red pants) after seeing the corpse by chance and performing masturbation.
The third understanding (personal conjecture)
Hypothesis 1: First of all, this is based on the fact that the female on the top of the mountain tells the truth, that is, the murderer is very smooth.
Hypothesis 2: The semen DNA is a wretched man, and he is not going to get soy sauce but a planned sexual assault.
First, explain the relationship between the characters
Xiao Bai Lian (Park Heung Kyu) is the murderer, the wretched man is responsible for the sexual assault, and Xiao Bai Lian’s sexual dysfunction is satisfied by killing and watching the insane male and molesting women. The surviving woman on the top of the mountain is the lover of a wretched man and a guinea pig for murder.
The above character relationships and inferences are explained below.
It mainly analyzes the 7th and 6th victims of the film, and expands the conjecture.
The seventh victim female student
Speaking of the last victim, the seventh person (female student), Xiao Bailian had time to commit the crime. At the beginning, the Seoul police said that the method of killing was "professional" (Xiao Bailian just finished his military service) and even "beautiful". When the last student died, the murderer could see the spoon, knife, and pen all neatly arranged. Afterwards, the killing was carried out and foreign objects were inserted. In the movie, the two police officers inspect Xiao Bailian's home at 1 hour, 27 minutes, and 01 seconds, and the furniture is arranged very neatly. 1 hour 28 minutes 02 seconds Little white face's work place, there are many things on the desktop, but they are neatly arranged. This habit of arranging things neatly is no exception even when killing people.
Here, the last victim is very special, because the 6 victims were all mature women over 25 years old, and in the film, the murderer first noticed the police wife (mature female) from the perspective of the murderer, and then saw the female student. Both After several hesitations, I chose a female student. The reason here can only be guessed. First, Xiao Bailian is anti-reconnaissance, deliberately acting as a female student and disrupting regularity. Second, the female student knows some inside information, killing someone is a better choice for him (this reason will be analyzed later).
If the sixth victim stuffed a peach woman in
this way, the sixth woman was also killed by Xiao Bai Lian. First, he stuffed a foreign body (peach). Secondly, it rained that day and broadcasted a song. Xiao Bai Lian was there to prove it. At the same time, the possibility of the wretched man (red pants, masturbating man) committing crimes is also ruled out here because he was in the police station at the time.
Analysis: Here we find the problem. The sixth and seventh victims did not mention being sexually assaulted, but they did before. What happened? We found that both cases occurred after the wretched man was arrested. .
Here we propose a bold conjecture that the murderer is a small white face, and the later sexual assault (including masturbation) is a wretched man. Therefore, the DNA in semen is not from a little white face, but from a wretched man.
First of all, Xiao Bai Lian has sexual function problems, so he obtains psychological satisfaction through murder and observing the sexual assault of others (insignificant men). After the wretched man is arrested, he can only get satisfaction by killing and stuffing foreign bodies (stuffing foreign bodies at XX is a manifestation of the problematic sexual function of this type of murderer. This is in the case of film and television works and criminal psychology. Not uncommon). When the Seoul police described stuffing peaches, Xiao Bailian was very excited. He disliked others mentioning it because it exposed his scars (sexual function problems).
Of course, this is just a conjecture of mine.
There are three possible hints in the film
. They are all working in factories, and they are very likely to know.
Second, the director is in the home of both of them, and both give the radio a very evil (maybe a tool for contact).
Third, in Xiao Bai Lian's house, a close-up photo is a group photo of two soldiers serving as soldiers. It is guessed that it is them two from the body shape.
Between the 6th and 7th, after interrogating Xiao Bailian for the first time, a key point appeared in the film. The two policemen forced to ask the fool who was the murderer. The fool provided the line "very handsome" (pointing directly to the little white face). After seeing the photo, the fool looked surprised. He clearly recognized the little white face in the photo, otherwise his eyes would not be surprised. Later, the idiot said, "When I was a kid, that person still put me in the fire." The person here is Xiao Bai Lian, because this was the first thing he thought of when he played with Xiao Bai Lian's photos. In other words, it was Xiao Bai Lian's photos that let him He thought of this, otherwise he wouldn't think of being burned for no reason.
In the video here, I only found one thing that might imply that they met when they were young, that is, at 1 hour, 27 minutes and 13 seconds, a close-up photo of the little white face. One of the close-ups is a photo of a person climbing a tree. I can only guess here. The director gave it. This close-up is meaningful. The people on this tree are fools, and they were friends at that time, because later in the film, the fools also climbed up the telephone poles very skillfully.
Victims 2, 3, 4, and 5. It was all singing, rainy nights, and there was mention of sexual assault, which was in line with Xiao Bailian's time for committing the crime, and the two committed the crime together.
The first victim, the surviving mountain woman. After Xiao Bai Lian came to the village, the first person to commit the crime, why did she survive?
First, it might be because she didn't see the murderer's face. Because when the police asked him, the idiot also said that all women who frowned and looked at me would die. This may be a repeat of the murderer's words, or a criminal character. So because the surviving woman didn't look at the murderer's face, she escaped. (I don't agree with this statement)
The second conjecture is that this woman is the lover of the wretched man. She and the wretched man are the protagonists of the school toilet incident, so they are likely to be connected. In the school incident, I guess, the wretched man attacked the woman in the toilet, was beaten, and passed out in the toilet. Later, Xiao Bailian took over. (A bit outrageous, I really didn’t want to understand the toilet incident)
In addition, at 1 hour, 18 minutes and 59 seconds of the film, the police questioned the surviving woman and showed a close-up of a gray work shirt in her house, which looked like a man's, and then a close-up of a red underwear. The red boxer briefs are obviously larger than the white ones next to them, and they may also be men's (insignificant men love red). The director's close-ups are meaningful. At that time, she was tied to the little white face, so "hands were very smooth." Why didn't she kill her because she was the lover of the wretched man, and was threatened (or conspired) by the wretched man later, and when the police suspected the wretched man, she could Give a wrong guide (the wretched male hand is not smooth).
This woman is a guilt for the murder of Xiaobailian and the wretched man. First try the maneuverability of the crime. Why didn't she die, because this woman is the lover of the wretched man. At the same time, I guess why Xiao Bailian chose to kill the female student in the end, because this female student was guiding the police to find the surviving female through the toilet incident. She probably knew more things, so she killed her mouth.
finally. When I went back in 2003, I recalled that it was a little white face. His appearance has become "ordinary" after 17 years, and he is more likely to be a wretched man (red pants) because his appearance is "very ordinary". This is also easier to explain why the police do. Surprised, because he missed it and didn't expect two people to commit the crime.
PS: Refute some online claims.
1. A fool is not a murderer, the Seoul police also said that he is not capable of committing crimes. I won't explain much about this.
2. A fool's father is not a murderer.
First, please note that the little girl said in 2003 that the person she met was "very ordinary". Imagine that in 2003, the first incident was in 1986, and 17 years have passed. At that time, the gray-haired idiot father must be very old, and the little girl used the word "uncle" instead of the word "grandpa".
Second, when the idiot was asked by two policemen who the murderer was, the idiot said that the man was "very handsome" and said that "the man is still in the fire." Second, when the idiot was dragged by the police to the field to simulate a crime, he said that the man was "very handsome". Dad was very concerned about him, and the fool called him "Dad" directly at the time, so the "person" the fool told the police was not his father.
Third, the police wife, that is, the nurse, said that people in the rotisserie "killed women". This may mean that someone saw the act of stalking by a fool, and then the newspaper said that the woman was dead, and the fool was following or paying attention. The woman died while the message came out. The director arranged for the police wife to say this. The main reason was to draw the line of fools, not to show that the murderer was from the barbecue restaurant.
View more about Memories of Murder reviews
