Will you accept an open marriage?
"Deadly Woman" is over, and the final episode still maintains a high level.
Especially the seven-minute murder scene, there is no dialogue, and the three time and space are intertwined, which is really breathtaking.
Attached video:
At this time, silence is better than sound, parallel editing, time and space interlace, domestic dramas are chasing after raising their pants, and it is estimated that they will not be able to catch up!
This murder scene must go down in drama history!
However, the result of the murder is a bit unexpected!
The English name of the episode is "why women kill". Because of the plot of the previous episodes, some netizens directly translated it as "why women kill their husbands" .
The fact is that none of the three women killed their husbands, and they did not kill for revenge.
Bezian is the most motivated to kill her husband. After all, she met the once-in-a-thousand-year-old scumbag "Rob", but in the end, she murdered with a knife, and she was not involved in the battle of life and death;
Simone's "killing her husband" was purely out of love, she wanted to free her husband from pain;
As for Taylor, she didn't kill her husband at all, to be precise, she killed her husband.
"Deadly Woman" actually reflects the problems and crises that occur in marriage. It is not necessarily the responsibility of one party, it may be a move or a choice at that time!
However, when there is a problem in the marriage and the role of the murderer is the wife, people will naturally feel that the husband is on the opposite side.
This is due to people's inertial thinking!
The era in which these three heroines lived is also a major point of interest.
There are three feminist movements in the United States.
The first feminist movement began in the late 1840s and ended in the 1920s. In this feminist movement, women pursued political rights , and the biggest achievement was that in the 1920s, women gained the right to vote;
The second feminist movement began in the 1960s and ended in the 1980s. During this period, equal rights for women and equal rights for blacks went hand in hand, which had a dramatic impact on the entire American and Western society; sexual liberation was also a very important part of it.
The third started in the early 1990s and has continued to this day. In fact, it wasn't until this movement that women really began to pursue equality.
Bezian lived in the 60s, she was a white housewife. This is also in line with the American background in the 1960s, the husband went out to earn money, and the wife stayed with the wife. Naturally, the husband who holds the economic lifeline must be the dominant player in the family.
Because of this, in the 1960s, it was common for husbands to abuse their wives.
The revolt of Bezian and her neighbor Mary also marked the beginning of the feminist movement in the 1960s.
Simone was an Asian socialite in the 1980s;
The 1980s was the end of the second feminist movement.
So, Simone is the exact opposite of Bezian.
Simone is the head of the family, sitting on thousands of properties. Instead, her husband, Carl, is dependent on his wife.
Because of the sexual liberation of the second feminist movement, Simeone can change husbands many times, and even if he is old, he is still accompanied by "talented people"!
Taylor is the current era, a black lawyer, and a bisexual;
Black + Feminist + Gay!
Properly "politically correct"!
Now many people in China look contemptuous when they mention "political correctness", and I personally hold different views.
Leaving aside the issues left over from history (the black-American issue, religious oppression of homosexuality), in today’s society, isn’t paying attention to vulnerable groups a manifestation of social civilization and progress?
Why do you have to think that "political correctness" is a bad thing?
When I watched the first episode of "Deadly Woman", my feeling was: in addition to the hearty editing of the scene, the discussion of the concept of marriage is also very interesting. For example, there are open marriages, threesomes, etc.
The first time I heard about "open marriage" was in "Wonderful Flowers".
The debate at the time was: Would you accept an open marriage?
As a positive, Bonnie Bonnie made a deep impression on me at the time, and she raised several interesting points at that time.
1. Sex and love can be separated!
2. The foundation of marriage is love. Monogamy is love. Polygamy, polyandry, and polygamy are also love!
3. The instability of marriage is precisely because marriage is a basket of business. When sex disappears, love disappears, and marriages break down!
Therefore, an open marriage is necessary!
At that time, Ma Weiwei used a very funny but clear method to tell people the infeasibility and impracticality of open marriage!
She used a multi-person "open marriage" to ridicule the absurdity and funnyness of this behavior!
At that time, I thought Ma Weiwei was sophistry, how could such a coincidence happen?
But after watching "Deadly Woman", I firmly believed in Ma Weiwei's point of view.
Open marriage is like a flood without a river bank. No one knows how far it will develop, and what consequences it will bring, no one can predict!
Many avant-garde advocates are advocating open marriage, term marriage, and even the "disappearance of marriage theory" is rampant.
Maybe in the near future, these are possible.
But what is the cost of implementation? No one has ever thought about it, or measured it!
The ideological revolution will inevitably lead to a series of chain reactions!
Needless to say, social public opinion will surely swept in like a flood of beasts!
What about the problems encountered in "open marriages"? I'm afraid there are more than in other marriages!
Deadly Woman Season 2 has been renewed!
It is reported that the new season will have a new set of characters to deal with "betrayal" behavior.
Personal inference, will it be a couple in the 1920s?
A little looking forward to it! ! !
View more about Why Women Kill reviews
