This minimalist style really couldn't be more love.
The translation of cloning a husband seems to be a bit misleading. Perhaps it is more appropriate to directly translate it as "clone", which is a bit self-defeating and titled.
Cloning is indeed a major challenge to human ethics.
After a person dies, clone the gene to create a new person, is "he" still him?
Is it fair to impose one's memory on another living "person"?
It can be simply logically inferred that since people can be cloned after death, then people can also be cloned when they are alive, so there are two identical people at the same time, and they must not be the same person.
Thomas has a line that is very sarcastic, everything in the world is different, no two feathers of a trillion birds are the same, and human fingerprints, iris, and even lung villi and brain structures are different. But gene duplication can break this natural law. The screenwriter seems to express his views through the mouth of the male protagonist.
Rebecca kept saying that nature has given human beings the right to choose, and that nature is our home. Maybe this idea is ahead of its time, but it will never be accepted by modern society, and it also violates the inherent laws of nature. In my opinion, it's more just for selfish desires.
Until more of the mystery of human consciousness and genes is discovered (perhaps never will be discovered), cloning is a forbidden place that human beings cannot touch.
View more about Womb reviews
