The title comes from the fact that the final episode's reversal of Frank really nearly got me out of the show.
Frank said: You are willing to expose the organization just for this? At that time, my heart was crying out for the same question, did you film such a magical drama just to blackmail Trump?
Fortunately, the wildly unfolding plot and open ending forced me back.
It's hard to sum up in one sentence what exactly this show is talking about. Because it says too much and is extremely sharp. Just to list some of what I saw:
How to evaluate a veteran soldier with PTSD who shot an unarmed Muslim;
How to evaluate the soldier's dedication to the country and the extreme ZZ is correct, took a black wife and gave birth to a cute mixed-race daughter, but because of PTSD, his temper became violent, the family broke up, and his ex-wife did not let him see his daughter freely;
How to evaluate a white human rights fighter, a female lawyer, in order to promote judicial justice from beginning to end, believing that no guilt is suspected, and clearing the guilt of many black people and Muslims suspected of planning terrorist attacks;
How do you evaluate a female police officer who has grown rapidly and is considered to be related to an affair with her boss? Does it prove that women in today's society are still discriminated against and misunderstood in their inter-level love in the workplace?
How to evaluate the black female police officers who have been moving bricks at the grassroots level for many years, once seized the only opportunity to climb up, and chose to give up the conduct of the police and turn a blind eye to the truth;
How to evaluate the police's willingness to tamper with CCTV to create perjury in order to fight crime and terrorists;
How to evaluate the importance of the police sacrificing a British citizen, the life of a British and a possible terrorist attack in order to prevent the organization from being exposed; People have been wronged, and even repeatedly implied that sexual abuse of children, the most contemptible illusion in today's society, is used to threaten the victim, and whether a possible terrorist attack is more important than the destruction of a family;
How to evaluate whether the suspected crimes of today's judicial system have never done more harm than good, leaving hidden dangers to national security.
I can guarantee that if you ask any one of them, it will definitely be a hot list. And the elements about human rights, justice, women's rights, veterans, Muslims, child sexual abuse hints, racial issues, etc. that appear in this play are all poking at the G-spot of Westerners. In the end, I didn't forget that ZZ correctly blacked Trump, I am a big Chinese and Maozi. The screenwriter's ability to grasp the audience is astonishing. It is conceivable that this will undoubtedly be a gluttonous feast for European and American countries. Not only the plot stomach hurts, but even the problem of refraction makes people excited.
Well, we now have these powerful condiments. Whether or not we can cook a good dish is a test of the director's skills. If there are too many ingredients accidentally, the main dish will be damaged, and the rhythm will not be worth the gain. But fortunately, it is the old man who is in charge. No matter how many elements the topic is, the main line is very clear and catchy. Decades of screen classics - the routine of being wronged, escaping pursuit, and clearing suspicion is always tried and true. Simply putting aside these real social problems, it is also a good suspense drama. The reversal method is reasonable and very original, because the murderer who framed the male protagonist appeared at the beginning, and this setting will also surprise the reasoning fans a little.
After the climax progressed, the biggest controversy about the show also surfaced with this semi-open ending. We believe that when the protagonist is wronged, the truth will eventually come to light, and the bad guy will always be punished accordingly. The show would still look good if it was arranged this way. But less thought. I like the way this ending is handled, because it rips the biggest problem into layers and wraps it up in front of the audience. In the end, we see a simple multiple-choice question: do not kill the wrong or not let go.
What the show finally discusses, the core wrapped in the astonishing appearance of video evidence being used by the police to forge is actually an old proposition that never changes. Is it right for the judicial system to let go and not kill the wrong one? Which is more important, human rights or human life?
I don't want to discuss this topic here because it's too big and no one can give a perfect answer these days. So any discussion is futile. When we hear a piece of news about a wrongful conviction that leads to innocent people being imprisoned or even losing their lives, we will question the justice of the judiciary, and we will express our support for the never-before-seen guilt. And when we learn that major criminals were exonerated due to insufficient evidence, or their sentences were commuted for various reasons, we would question the strictness of the judiciary, and why not let the guillotine fall easily.
Our emotions always fluctuate with a single event, and we always see only what we want to see. So even if the judiciary cannot be truly fair and reasonable. Even if it is full of grievances and sins behind it. Even if the heroine finally chooses a completely different path from Hannah, even if the justice may never be truly fair and just, we must believe that as long as everyone is willing to stick to their inner justice, even if we can never get it, we You can also approach it infinitely step by step.
View more about The Capture reviews
