I still like the way the story is narrated. Maybe on the one hand, it is more in line with my personal view on the issue of the afterlife. The narrative aspects are still solid, but there are still bugs in some places. For example, the male protagonist is often guided by magical "coincidences", but the goose is indeed the most unwilling to believe that there is a superpower that surpasses science; for example, it is obviously the iris system that only five people can log in, and a hospital nurse can log in; The sister of the child welfare home in India has a strong memory. Just by looking at the pupil in the photo, she can identify and name her name at a glance. I admit that this pupil is quite special, but she sees so much every day and can tell who she is. I still feel like Just like the brain with its own search, it should be deliberately done by the director in order not to procrastinate, so every time there is a clue, it is a bit far-fetched. Finally, I will comment on the characters. I think the male lead is a waste. The wife of the male lead who married later is also a lab assistant. It is really great. Whether it is ethical or moral, as a wife, he can be a human being. No jealousy, she is still selfless and dedicated only to scientific progress at the expense of pushing her husband out for testing, using her son as an experimental subject, and proposing to transform her garage into a laboratory when she was dancing romantically with her husband. The first bug experiment was almost done by herself. Well, the male protagonist is basically glued to the female ticket every day. If he just wants to never practice, the achievements are all attributed to the male protagonist. The perfect woman scientist wife, the greatest person in the film.
View more about I Origins reviews
