This kind of "seeing the big from the small" is actually very contradictory. On the one hand, if this dispute, which was originally a misunderstanding and quarrel, was not unknowingly magnified to the political level, we had to dig deep and explore the never-ending "war" left by history, ethnicity, and belief, and we might not understand many parties. The suffering of complex entanglement will not understand the equality of suffering that is pointed out at the end. But on the other hand, is this "rising" and "incitement" necessary, and has narrow nationalism inadvertently kidnapped everyone caught in it? You could say that the confrontation between the two sides is a microcosm of the problems and legacy behind the two peoples, but in this case, can the Palestinian foreman represent all the Palestinian refugees or the wrongful Palestinian invaders? And the car repair shop owner in Lebanon, can his personal position and opinions really represent everyone behind him? This invisible kidnapping is actually mixed with too many irrelevant elements. One is to incite hatred and exacerbate the already confrontational and tense situation in the country, and the other is to reopen the wounds of all those who have experienced the painful past, including the parties involved. At the same time, when so many "big propositions" such as ethnicity, history, and politics have been mixed in, the real demands of the parties, which are the core of this case, will inevitably be coerced and become victims.
So the last concept of respecting wounds and suffering equality may be slightly inferior to what appeared in the middle interview in my opinion: "We can't change the past, we can remember it, but we can't be entangled in it, so that we are controlled by it. It. The past is the past. It's time to turn the page."
#When will we be free from uncontrolled kidnapping and coercion
(Baiziwan Film Archive broke down after half of its machines, and went back to the dormitory to make up in the rain.?)
View more about The Insult reviews
