There are anti-Japanese dramas in China that tear Japanese devils by hand, and now India has also produced anti-British dramas tearing up British devils.
I read the news before that Aamir Khan publicly apologized to the audience because the movie was too bad. I also thought, how bad is it to be scolded by the audience to the point of apologizing. It is now known. A movie that is perfectly fine to watch at double speed. As an excellent filmmaker who has insisted on making films with a score of 9 or more for a long time, this time he handed over a work with a score of 5. Can audience fathers not be disappointed?
Every previous film will dig social phenomena for a specific problem and phenomenon. This time there seems to be a big topic of historical nation, but the plot is really unsightly. In the whole movie, there are only three kinds of people: the thugs, the British, and Figeira. The British had only one lackey, Figira, and the rest of the Indians were thugs who were unwilling to be slaves. And except for the male protagonist, everyone's IQ is 0, so the whole movie is the male protagonist jumping up and down like a monkey, forcing him to stop. Anyway, what the male protagonist said is what he said, so he entertained himself and played smartly for two hours. . . .
View more about Thugs of Hindostan reviews
