From my point of view, it's basically using the appearance of a bird to interpret the story of how a dead house loser with self-esteem higher than ability and low emotional intelligence got the girlfriend of a scientist. Is this impossible?
In fact, seeing that birds don't know how to fly, they need to shoot with a slingshot.
But still...em...
The only desirable thing is that the plot criticizes the shortcomings of the protagonist Red Bird.
1) Afraid of not being noticed and ignored, and eager to continue to play pranks with Pig Island (Pig Island technology is so much stronger than Bird Island, pigs must be playing with birds)
2) Always compete for the limelight (competing with the pig king to be the captain, the residents of the bird island do not need to take refuge)
3) Arbitrary, no team spirit
4) Disrespect for teammates, arrogance (criticizing pig scientists' weapons)
5) Reluctance to admit mistakes or failures (no plan but forcibly saying there is a plan)
In addition, the play arranges the plot of the protagonist's self-reflection and the final "great reconciliation", and the most worthy of appreciation is the red bird's ability to self-reflect and the sense of responsibility to admit mistakes. These two points are very important in life
So this movie is really for kids.
Many children also have problems with the red bird. The red bird shows in the movie that this character is not flattering. How can I get others to recognize and like it?
Because I'm not the target audience, except for the really funny part of sneaking in as a vulture, the audience was boring.
View more about The Angry Birds Movie 2 reviews
