Acting has also been online.
Use the asymmetry and concealment of information and narration to make every line and story seem well-founded.
The narrative trick and the spirit of reasoning coexist.
I want to argue against a few so-called bugs and slots for this movie:
Slot 1: Regarding [Lawyer's Referral], so important, why don't you recommend it face-to-face?
Personally, this statement is a typical hindsight. At that time, the male protagonist was facing an upcoming court session and hard evidence. His lawyer partners were busy all over the world to help him deal with the existence of the [driver]. Although the male protagonist is a lot of money, it is safer to do this kind of thing by yourself. Here is [Failed to refer in person] There is a time-constrained condition-the male lawyer is not busy yet.
The time of the appointment, the person to whom the appointment was made, the content of the interview, and several evidences (news reports) of the deceitful male protagonist. The fake lawyers did everything and gave reasonable explanations.
Then let's think about it, how many coincidences does a person know your interview time, character, content, professionalism shown, and even the key evidence of the conversation? I think anyone who has studied probability theory knows that the probability of meeting so many conditions at the same time is very small except for me. Because at this moment, the hero doesn't even know that the father has been watching him like a shadow for a long, long time. If he knew it, he would still doubt it.
In the end, the male protagonist never regarded the lawyer as his own in the early stage. He is constantly tempting and cunningly hiding himself, treating everything as a court confrontation and rebuttal to deceive. If it weren't for being exposed, he would not admit everything.
Slot 2: Uncle and aunt's IQ is too high.
From the perspective of the ability to observe details, it is quite powerful.
But when Laura put the phone back in, the flaws began to be irreparable. Because it is easy to find that the male protagonist has used his mobile phone after he left home, which means that the mobile phone was put back. I want to have this intuition and evidence to recall the heroine’s various abnormal performances and other evidence support (such as the left brake marks, Laura adjusted the driving seat, the license plate number, the lighter on the car, etc.) , It should be possible to figure out something.
Then, although the grandfather and aunt like to live a life without controversy, it does not mean that they are simple and ignorant old farmers who have never seen the market (sorry for using this term, I am not trying to imply anything here). The uncle is a former BMW senior engineer, and the aunt is a PhD in literature and a professor at a genuine university. Here we tell the audience from the side that arming ourselves with wisdom and knowledge is the highest combat effectiveness. The male lead is also a negative teaching material.
Slot 3: Why doesn't the handsome son wear a seat belt and still play with his mobile phone and drive? Isn't it dangerous?
I dare say that I have seen many taxi drivers in Changsha who are driving and chatting on WeChat to read news.
Although this is a pretty wrong model, isn't this theory similar to [this girl is so exposed and harassed]? It's my responsibility that I didn't wear a seat belt, but I'm all to blame for the crash?
After being hit, the handsome son’s car flew out (a bit exaggerated), but the male lead just turned around. From a physics point of view, this shows that handsome son’s car speed is not so fast (the same energy The change state is large, one change state is small, of course, it also has the influence of the weight of the car), and the male protagonist is speeding up in order to catch the handicap. Similarly, the handsome son has lived there for a long time, he knows the road conditions (the mountain road is narrow, there are only two lanes) and the existence of wild deer. Rarely does a car like that on a rampage come over.
Slot 4: These reversals have been guessed a long time ago.
I want to say that this is not terrible or interesting at all. When the hypnosis master started, I could see that hypnosis started from that time. But this does not affect the follow-up development and I still look forward to the plot.
I think the wonderful thing about the reversal in "The Invisible Guest" is that it is not reversing for the sake of reversal, not the reversal of discovering the great secret, but the psychological offensive and defensive deduction of two people in a room. Reasoning carefully, rather than relying on memories to dig up clues that were deliberately buried in the front of the film (typically the scenes that Dr. Yang suddenly recalled in "The Great Reversal", there is no meaning to spray, but I feel that this processing method is not Smart. Of course, I'm a person who doesn't hurt while standing and talking (233333). This is the focus of this film.
Wit parents Jedi against the murderous beast scumbag. I don’t think this story is too condensed. But what is really rare is the reasoning and clever design. The audience wants more than just explanations, but also reasonable and unexpected explanations.
"The Invisible Guest" only gave a number of reasonable and unexpected explanations in the form of dialogue, which completely satisfied my requirements on this point.
Acting, appearance, and IQ are always online. The expressiveness of the parents and the twists and turns of the male protagonist's image are really great. I can feel the heartache and the desperate determination, perseverance and intelligence of losing my handsome son across the screen.
It's really a movie worth watching.
Even if I already know the truth, I still feel very touching.
The only place is that I want to know where the blood on Laura's wrist is stuck. Because if the male protagonist is the core, she should not answer the phone (should be replaced by the male protagonist) and other plots.
View more about The Invisible Guest reviews
