First, the picture is either disgusting or terrifying; second, it either has multiple metaphors, political implications, religious feminism, etc., or it represents the profound.
It is first of all a movie. The language of the camera lens must be read and understood by people. This is superb. This movie is obviously a self-inflicted creation of the director. After all, no one will have so much help before watching the movie. As for the knowledge base of understanding, some people say that excellent art films will have serious polarization, but a film like this has not reached the level of polarization. When the public sees a thousand people, ten people think that it is good. Therefore, the audience of this movie is neither horror movie fans, nor literary film fans, nor the general public. At most, it is aimed at audiences who are both German history fans and Christians. Sorry, I am neither.
The excellence of a film is not just about how profound and multiple meanings are conveyed outside the camera, and then ignore the ability to express in front of the camera, but to achieve a balance between the two is the most important thing, otherwise in the history of film, wouldn’t everyone create abstract films? Is it the representative of the peak of artistic attainments? (Repeated shots of water droplets and ripples, just interpret the meaning behind them anyway)
View more about Suspiria reviews
