Write before reading other people's movie reviews

Evert 2022-03-21 09:03:06

Suddenly I found that there was nothing to say, because I didn't know where to start.

I think considering that only people who have experienced something (what) can understand this movie, so if you don't understand most of this movie, then you don't need to read this review. (Add one sentence, the whole article is written in Chongqing dialect)

I had the experience of offending the leader before, because of some factors, I was so depressed that after I left, I still wanted to kill him, torturing me every day and night ( myself), I will be disappointed with everyone when I do the foreshadowing work of killing, and I will feel incompetent if I give up not killing, so I have this idea of ​​killing intermittently, but it has never been implemented.

In the second year, I began to have the behavior of sitting on the sofa looking at the wall lamp, or looking at my shadow with my back to the lamp, and even having a conversation with each person (myself) who has been silent all the year And the personality that everyone ignores, it is like a monster that is imprisoned in a dungeon all the year round. It made me very tired, and I didn't know how to get along with him. During that time, I lost my mind like a ghost (a bit like the last state of the male lead's colleague who studied psychology, and also saw a psychiatrist for a year) .

I think this is the problem. The reason why the male protagonist is irritable and restless is that he has been suppressing the anger that everyone cannot solve the problem (incompetence). Through the dialogue with the hypnotist (the prisoner), the male protagonist constantly realizes that everyone wants to The murderous personality or inner voice.

When I typed the word hypnotist in the last paragraph, I was thinking, is this allegation correct? He is a prisoner, and the word hypnotist has no criminal intent. I suddenly realized a problem, I should be the same as the male protagonist and start to follow him.

My experience at the time was that I always felt like someone was staring at me, in the closet, in the dark, everywhere, unknown monsters (inner demons) were always chaotic, and I was uneasy. It wasn't until late at night when I turned off the lights in my house and took off my glasses that I started to talk to the monsters I associate with my blurry vision, such as seeing the layers of quilt covers as an old face , or think of the lamp as a painful talking plaster. Of course those are just objects projected by my inner voice.

Since this iconic event, I have gradually stopped being (so) afraid of them. I can slowly learn to understand and resolve everyone's anxiety, and I don't have to follow the rhythm in my head. Of course, I am still anxious now, but at least I don't have any illusions about others monitoring me and talking about me. (Suddenly I think of a sentence, a message from a Taiwan YouTube user outside the wall: You don't have to dance with the five cents.)

When I watched the film, I was thinking that the way a hypnotist talks is a lot like the way a parent talks to a baby, or the way a person in power talks to an object under control is ignoring the existence of the other party, no matter what questions the other party asks, I They all walk at their own pace, ignoring each other's feelings and questions. Aren’t parents or group bosses often stunned (like this), they keep asking questions, you want to refute or explain something, they will keep repeating a sentence, and through this repeated sentence, they will complete the process of ignoring your existence. , and then you run after the other side.

This method of mastering the structure of the dialogue, turning words into violence and taking power into my own hands, I have clearly seen it in the book The Fascinating Man Method, and I accept a lot of what it says in that book. I am quite repelled by the construction of discourse structure alone, so that I have a half negative attitude towards this book. Of course, it is still a bit difficult to write a book in good faith, especially a book that teaches you about appointments. cannon book. This is using power, not love as he himself mentioned earlier.

Therefore, in the scene of the collective interrogation of the executives later, the minister and the hypnotized criminal are fighting for power. They both said: I am asking you, not you are asking me. Both of them clearly used this principle. (I think both sides also do this when Taiwanese parliamentarians question the leaders of their departments. They don’t follow the other’s rhythm.

In fact, to put it bluntly, what makes people anxious is that your will is not responded to and ignored, and the most annoying and helpless thing is that each of your (own) brains is controlling each of you, You don't feel everyone's presence. And we have been subtly cultivating this kind of human-to-human relationship since we were young, so it is easy to get caught up in it, or to exercise control over others.

I mentioned before about my hesitation when I was thinking about what the hypnotized criminal would say, but it also answered the key to not being led away, that is, the key to not letting myself fall into the control of other people's words-getting out, I was just thinking After taking a moment to ask a question, I jumped out. Sometimes it is very important to be able to withdraw freely when you are in such a situation that you want to be controlled. So, freedom is a very precious thing. It can only be in that small environment, and in the end, there is only one option to fight with the opponent (so bad guys like to create a closed environment and close your heart). As for the fighting experience, I don't have it, but you can see from the conversation between the criminal and the high-ranking police officer. In order not to be controlled, he will use his own way to treat others, and constantly ignore each other. And ask questions at their own pace, which also makes those in power feel that they are out of control, so senior officials get angry (angry).

After talking about a lot (so much), let’s talk about the ending. I think if it is really “Sanji”, I’d better go to Okinawa with my wife first, otherwise what I see is not Shengji, but Cruel, of course, a certain decision was made, but in a sense, it was reconciled with everyone, and the "problem" was solved.

It's just that time is a sieve after all, and only good things will be left, and the rest will gradually become less important. So in the end, kindness is still a long-term judgment of innocence for each of you in the future. Good to go around.

But I can tell you how I have changed after going through those things.

1. I have accepted the evil in everyone's heart. As for what he will develop into, I don't know. Just like the feeling in the movie, the hypnotist (note the reference) is more like a complete person. It's just that I will try my best to understand the driving force and basis behind the growth of this evil, and then try to satisfy it at the root, instead of letting it grow arbitrarily with the rhythm of others (others). Of course, not all of them can do it, and when people do "bad things that they haven't done before", they won't realize that everyone is doing evil.

2. Because of the first point, it is difficult for me to trust other people (other people) now. I also keep a certain distance and stay alone for a long time. It might be better in the future.

3. Occasionally, when I see the shadow of each person, I will still say: What are you thinking about? Usually, when this question comes up, it means that there is something in the mind. If there is no idea, it will not ask the question to the shadow at all. Occasionally speaking to myself on the street is acceptable, but I try to keep it so that no other onlookers can watch.

The whole article is written in Chongqing dialect, which is my native language, and is also my idiom for self-talk and self-examination. In fact, there are occasional words in Mandarin, which naturally come together.

I'm a little worried that this article seems to be spreading a cult, because the experiences I have in the middle are not encouraging in retrospect, as if they are encouraging everyone to release the evil in everyone's heart, but on the other hand, I really experienced Only the evil can make you feel the truth, otherwise the evil that others say, this kind of value judgment is like talking on paper, and I am also very contradictory on this issue. However, human nature should be released, and it should be based on not harming others. I hope you are protecting yourself even if you hurt others.

Damn, like a sermon, tired, stop writing

postscript:

When I read it back, whether the reference in the text is "hypnotist" or "hypnotized criminal", this is just like when I write about demons, I sometimes use "he" and sometimes "it", sometimes reject, sometimes understand, understand Then try to be satisfied from the root, and I can only do it here. stop writing

Comment after reading other people's comments:

Because the matter of returning to the old house to kill the hypnotist was contrary to my expectations, so I didn't look carefully, and realized that in the end the male protagonist took over the mission of the big stick, which is when the male protagonist started Unleashing the sociopaths of others, well, no wonder the ending feels cruel and not holy. However, other film critics have said that Shengji refers to awakening the anti-social personality of others, as I said before, making others "more like a complete person", that's right, but the practice can be discussed again, we all have motives admit he exists. So I still feel that the name Seiji is a little bit ironic. If the male protagonist smiled when he preached, it would be a bit of a cult.

View more about Cure reviews

Related Articles