Generally speaking, it is still very good-looking. There are corresponding foreshadowings in the early stage. The logic is indeed not impeccable, but I think the rhythm and details make up for this lack. Let's just say, if the bug is after watching the movie, I want to find it again. It’s not right, or even though it was found to be wrong at the time (why did a disabled person have to use explosives for the bank floor dug up a few times), but the subsequent tense plot allows you to temporarily put aside this doubt and continue watching, this is not a failure (forcibly saving your respect) .
The film as a whole is a story of a tech nerd showing off his talents, and it's a coincidence that I know such a techie (not) nerd, so throughout the movie his face flashed back several times to the scenes he explained to me before, which greatly increased The authenticity of the film, because I know he can do it.
If the planning in the early stage is still just a normal performance of a technical house, the confrontation in the last 20 minutes is simply a miracle. The moment the protagonist shouted "left-handed", the audience burst into laughter, and the sheriff's call came at just the right time. This scene adds 20 points to the movie rating.
Another thing that feels good is the portrayal of the characters (the emotional lines of the hero and heroine can be ignored). The motive of the male protagonist is to make a sum of money, and there is no moral burden to eat black. Later, what happened to the girl made him, who had already projected his feelings for his daughter on the little girl, even more motivated for revenge. But when the explosive woman was blocked in the tunnel with rising water, she struggled to lend a hand, and at that moment I patted my thigh in my heart. The sense of substitution is very strong. He has the motive of black and black, but after all, he is an ordinary person. It is very difficult to see a living person die in front of his eyes, so he stretched out his hand; but the woman immediately dragged him down And shouting, he can also get rid of the woman and put the lid on it. This detail to me enriches the character of the character, kind but not Virgin.
It's cool to watch the movie, but there are still many problems when you think about it from the viewing environment. As mentioned earlier, you can dig the ground but you have to use explosives. Some film critics say that it is understandable to blow the water pipe for the convenience of the male protagonist, but since the water pipe has been dug out and placed in front of you, as a technical house, there must be other ways to achieve the goal. The specific method, who, please come out and answer.
In addition, it is difficult to justify the hole in the basement. The protagonist in the play was not included in the suspect category by the police for the time being because the power was cut off at the time and the sundries were still piled up, but the police said that they would come back the next day to conduct a careful search. As soon as the object was cleared away, the hole was immediately revealed, and normal people could see that it was man-made (you see how round the hole is), not the result of a burst water pipe. The hole on the bank floor can also be found to be smashed rather than blasted (the female gangster, as a blasting expert, did not find this problem, and if she is not professional, she will only die). There are other people involved in this conclusion. The protagonist doesn't seem to have a good reason to explain it.
The gangster found that the tarpaulin seemed to have been passive, and it was too simple to check if the watch was missing.
View more about At the End of the Tunnel reviews
