Through the introduction of the film, we can basically determine the following facts:
1. The "Prime Minister" is a British puppet under the control of the United States. The US manipulating him is that the "professor" allowed the "Prime Minister" to join the CIA, and the "Prime Minister" is a person who has no opinion. The suggestions of the "Prime Minister" often become the decision of the "Prime Minister". The source of the suggestions of "the prime minister's wife" shows that from the "professor", as for the "professor", of course we can think of it as a representative of the United States.
2. After the "Prime Minister" stepped down, the "former shadow writer" who helped him write his memoirs discovered the secret of the "Prime Minister's wife", but had a quarrel with the "Prime Minister" without any evidence, and then went to " "Professor" there to verify, but was killed on the way back.
3. The "Shadow Writer" also discovered this situation. When attending the new book launch conference, he finally solved the puzzle and was eventually killed.
But there is a question. Why was the "Prime Minister" killed? Judging from the film, this seems to be normal. From the US investigators showing the “angry protesters” photos to the “shadow writers” and the hard work of the “angry protesters”, one can think of “angry”. Protesters "buy homicide." But this explanation may be difficult to satisfy everyone, and the killing of the "prime minister" does not seem to have much to do with the film. Because the key to the film seems to be that the "shadow killer" solves the puzzle as the ultimate goal, the "prime minister" does not seem to have to die. In fact, from the perspective of the whole film, there are three people who must die, the "Prime Minister" and two "shadow writers, and the "Prime Minister" is the key point. He must die. In fact, it starts with the so-called "prisoner abuse incident". At the beginning of the prosecution in The Hague Court, the fate of the "Prime Minister" was doomed. Afterwards, to attend a banquet in Washington was his biggest wrong decision. If he could follow the advice of the "Prime Minister's wife" and return to London, he might continue to survive. It might be bigger.
From the above discussion, we know that the "Prime Minister" is a person who has no opinion. Just imagine what the result of investigation and prosecution will be for such a person, and whether it is possible for all the truth to be revealed. If this is the case, the United States will have the greatest trouble. Yes, what if the problem can be solved once and for all? The safest to die. The appearance of the "angry protester" is normal. Look at his performance and say that he killed the "Prime Minister" or planned to kill the "Prime Minister". It makes sense, and the United States can completely get out of the matter. . I can conclude that this "angry protester" must also have a lot to do with the CIA in the United States.
Then there is the "Secretary of Foreign Affairs," the political enemy of the "Prime Minister", who seems to have no problem. But the question is, a retired British "Foreign Minister" actually lives in the United States. Why? The two "shadow writers" both had contact with him and told him about the problems they found, but they all died. Why did the Prime Minister decide not to return to London, but rather go to Washington to attend a so-called important meeting, and he was killed on the way back? It was this "Foreign Minister" who publicly stated on TV that he was willing to be a witness. Forcing the "Prime Minister" to use his own words to stay in the United States seeking protection in a little panic, leading to the inevitable result of being killed. Take another look at the three murdered. Among them, the "former shadow writer" called him before he was killed. Soon after the "Shadow Writer" met him, the "Prime Minister" was killed. This dear friend is actually the most powerful pawn in the United States, let alone his identity, the British "Secretary of Foreign Affairs", what does this job do? My judgment is that when the "former shadow writer" finds out the prime minister's problem, who can he turn to? Only to find the political enemy of this "Prime Minister", because perhaps only the enemy is reliable, but unfortunately, the political enemy of this "Prime Minister", but the CIA requires him to play the role of such a "political enemy", so "former shadow writer" "Death is inevitable. After that, it is expected that the fact that the "Prime Minister" has been prosecuted is inevitable. The "Minister of Foreign Affairs" will continue to play his role, forcing the "Prime Minister" to stay in the United States and creating conditions for his murder by the so-called "angry protesters." As for the "shadow writer", he said it well, should both of the shadow writers be drowned? I want to make it more clear. Is it possible that all three people die in the United States? In this way, the United States’ goal is too big, especially if the protagonist "Shadow Writer" in the film also died in the United States, someone who is a little clearer It can be considered that there must be a big secret hidden, because these three people can basically be regarded as the knowers of the secret, and all of them died in the United States. Can the United States break away from the relationship? Therefore, the death of the three people has something to do with the "Secretary of Foreign Affairs", and the Secretary of Foreign Affairs must also have a great relationship with the US CIA.
Let's talk about "the prime minister's wife" and "professor". Let me tell you that these two people who are clearly identified and who seem to belong to the murderers behind the scenes may actually have nothing to do with the death of the three. "The Prime Minister's wife" can be said to be absolutely irrelevant. Although her identity is clear, the mission of the American CIA is to control the "Prime Minister" and then make decisions that are in the interests of the United States for him. But in the film, it is obvious that the "Mrs. Prime Minister" still loves the "Prime Minister". As a saying goes, if a woman is jealous for you, it means she loves you. Don't forget a detail. When the "Prime Minister" was sued by the Hague court, she advocated returning to the UK, if that was the case. The "Prime Minister" may be temporarily killed, but the "Prime Minister" was killed. Pay attention to where she is. She is preparing to embrace the "Prime Minister" at such a close distance. The "Shadow Writer" finally revealed her identity. Although she was surprised, you can't imagine. When a person is surrounded, there is still a way to order the killer outside the door to kill the "Shadow Writer" in the end. You must know that the press conference did not invite the "Shadow Writer", and it is impossible for her to ambush outside the door in advance. Killer. Then, in the film, she showed anger, helplessness, and jealousy of women towards the ambiguous relationship between the "Prime Minister" and the "Secretary". It was completely normal to exclude her. We can think that although she is the CIA, and the combination with the "Prime Minister" is a political need, but in the long-term life, love is inevitable, so she can use the "Prime Minister" in some political decisions, but when the real threat is " When the "Prime Minister"'s reputation, status, and even life situations arise, she is undoubtedly on the "Prime Minister" side. She is an agent and a wife at the same time.
As for the "professor", pay attention to one detail. When "Shadow Writer" and "Professor" met, the secretary of "Professor" was making a call, and the content of the call was shown on the subtitles. But who of you heard clearly what the secretary said in the film? If you don’t watch the subtitles. Moreover, from the film, it is obvious that the "Professor" and "Shadow Writer" did not hear them at all. Otherwise, even if the "professor" does not respond, will the "shadow writer" hear those words without any response? When the "former shadow writer" arrived at the "professor"'s house, the "professor" was not at home and asked the secretary to take the schedule. Perhaps the "Professor" didn't lie. Maybe he really wasn't there that day, so who was there? Perhaps the secretary of the "professor". As for the "shadow writer" leaving the professor's home and being followed, it is not the professor's act. In the film, when the "shadow writer" arrives at the "professor"'s home, there is a detail. A black car has driven by and there are two people in the car. Then it was a black car that chased the "shadow writer" with two people in it. Is it a coincidence? Should this be designed in the film? Therefore, it can be judged that, because of the special status of the "professor", the CIA will not ignore the people he communicates with here. Whether it is a "shadow writer" or a "pre-shadow writer", when they came here, they were stared at, and the one who confirmed their identity and reported to the outside world was not the "professor" but the "professor" secretary . Of course, it was the "Secretary of Foreign Affairs" who confirmed how much insider they knew. As for the "Professor" himself, perhaps like the "Prime Minister", he was only responsible for controlling the decision of the "Prime Minister" but was not involved in the murder. As you can see from the film, he finally stopped the "Prime Minister", basically. There is no time to arrange the murder of the "shadow writer". There is another question here, that is, whether the two agents who tracked down the "shadow writers" are really ready to solve the "shadow writers" on board. This is hard to say. This is a questionable point. I can only say that when the "Shadow Writer" escaped the hunt and finally saw the "Secretary of Foreign Affairs", the plan to kill him in the United States had changed.
The last person we want to talk about is the "secretary" of the "Prime Minister". She has followed the "Prime Minister" for eight years and has an ambiguous relationship with the "Prime Minister". The "Prime Minister" seems to be inseparable from her. But the question arises. Can the "Prime Minister" who can almost completely control the "Prime Minister" can tolerate a "secretary" like a lover by his husband's side. If, as she herself said, the "Prime Minister" almost obeyed her opinions, she basically has absolute means to drive away this eight-year possible rival in love. The question is why didn't she rush? Secondly, why has the "Prime Minister" who has always been obedient and obedient suddenly disobedient recently? Let me give you an answer. The "secretary" is also an agent of the CIA, sent to the Prime Minister. "The Prime Minister's wife" obviously knows this situation, and perhaps she arranged it, because if she wants to arrange a secretary for the "Prime Minister", the "Prime Minister" is obedient, and of course the "Prime Minister's wife" will not be fully involved in everything about the "Prime Minister". Active, but the "secretary" can. But what the "Prime Minister's wife" did not expect is that this "secretary" has a more important task to control the Prime Minister. When the "Prime Minister's wife" is unwilling to control or harm the "Prime Minister" in accordance with the interests of the United States, it is up to her. To be done. To do this, "ambiguity" is necessary. But the "Mrs. Prime Minister" must endure this ambiguity, because she can't drive away or even change all of this. Everyone is a colleague of the CIA, and everyone has their own tasks. Everyone noticed that the "secretary" mentioned her husband twice, but the mysterious husband never came out. And the "Mrs. Prime Minister" had a meaningful conversation with the "Shadow Writer" the next morning after having a relationship with the "Shadow Writer"-"Shadow Writer": I wondered why the family tree No more information about you on? "The Prime Minister's wife": What's the matter, I'm just his wife. "Shadow Writer": Even so, there should be a detailed record on the family tree. "The Prime Minister's wife": Why do you want this? Most women have no detailed records. Pay attention to these words, we see two messages, 1. "The Prime Minister's wife" has completely regarded herself as a wife, and the status of a CIA agent is already second. 2. Most women have no detailed records, implying that "secretaries" are equally mysterious and have no records. When the existence of the "Prime Minister" is already a major threat to the interests of the United States, and the "Prime Minister" can no longer play a role at this time, she will protect the "Prime Minister." At this time, the "secretary" must come out to take the place of the "Prime Minister's wife", so the "Prime Minister" has not listened to the "Prime Minister's wife" recently and has instead paid attention to the "Secretary"'s opinions. As you can see, it was because of the "secretary"'s suggestion that the "Prime Minister" decided to stay in the United States and was eventually killed. When the "Prime Minister" decided to remind and protect the "Prime Minister", the "Secretary" had completely cut off the necessary connection between her and the "Prime Minister". As for the "former shadow writer", the existence of the "secretary" will inevitably cause him to have no secrets at all. It is completely normal for him to be killed if he finds out. The murder of the "Shadow Writer" is even more illustrative. He was not on the list of inviters. It was the "Secretary" who invited him. In this way, the timing and method of arranging the most murdered murder were completely okay. Everyone can pay attention to one detail. When the secretary finally saw the "Shadow Writer", he cried sadly. We can think of it as a bit of sorrow for the death of the "Prime Minister", or it can be regarded as the final goodbye to the "Shadow Writer". And before that, when the "Shadow Writer" boarded the plane, she said-I hope this is not your last time, but also very meaningful, because this is indeed the last time the "Shadow Writer", "Prime Minister He died after getting off the plane. Of course, the "Shadow Writer" would never have a chance to take it again, and the "Shadow Writer" must die soon. When the shadow writer wrote a note to the "Mrs. Prime Minister" to reveal the final truth, the "secretary" never appeared again. Because it is no longer necessary, her task has been completed.
View more about The Ghost Writer reviews
