Let’s talk about the scoring basis first. The first serious problem is that there is a bias in genre cognition, which is equivalent to writing off the topic: it cannot be regarded as a documentary.
Regardless of the narrative style, logic, orderliness, or the position of being a "recorder" is wrong. This should be positioned as a feature film or an interview record that is a topic of celebrity anecdotes and commercial traffic. The director doesn't feel like a layman who makes documentaries anymore, and he doesn't understand what he's thinking. Is it because it is convenient to say that it is a documentary to increase the credibility of the event? If it is for this, I think it is the last word that it is better to design the plot more carefully.
However, the filming of this film is actually quite delicate. It can be seen that the two actors are also very carefully prepared. There is a sense of the same person's narration between the lines of the two people, but they are very good, according to the different styles of the two people. Similar to the different emotional characteristics of mj, the content of the conversation has an alternation. james is based on the delicate emotions that focus on nostalgic and tender "love", and then wade is responsible for more explosiveness. Comparing the bolder tone with more erotic content based on "stimulus" can make the two parts relevant without monotonous repetition, and the combination of slowness and urgency has a chemical effect. There will be a feeling that the story will gradually unfold through the different perspectives of the two people, and they can understand each other. In fact, it can be seen that the production is very well-made and quite powerful. If the two of them said this part of the lines was conceived and arranged by the director, then I think the director is actually very good at arranging the tune, and he is also a person who understands the psychology of the audience. People, and they know better how to use sound, light, ambient sound, etc. to provide certain guidance to produce the effect he wants. It should be an old pen with experience in this area. I understand why this is considered a documentary, and I don't quite understand what the practical significance of this film is calling for, is it calling for rational star pursuit? Or are you calling attention to child sexual abuse? If it is the former, then I think the information and content of other fans of mj should be appropriately added, because if it is to discuss rational star chasing, they are the people who are directly related to the event. And if the center is the latter...that is, focusing on child sexual abuse and the category of ME too movements. I sincerely believe that the United States is already neurotic enough about child sexual abuse, and the social significance of emphasizing it does not feel great. Although it is indeed a way to protect children by forming this relatively strict ethos of crackdowns, I still feel that………………It feels very familiar. not feeling well.
The two stars are given after deducting the flaws and wrong parts and positioning errors, etc., because I am not a fan. I don't want to just give a very low score. I think this score can represent my honest evaluation of the film. I think two stars are reasonable. This movie has its own merits, and it was made with care. However, the flaws are also very obvious. I won't talk about the facts or bugs behind them. I have basically read them carefully, but as far as the movie itself is concerned, what I want to write in this part is based on the movie level. View.
Not a glass heart, welcome to communicate. I still hope to get constructive exchanges and opinions. I can't even spray me.
I think no matter which side of my heart is inclined to, let it go first, and look at the information provided by the opposite of this film with a calm eye. After mastering the information that should be mastered, and then making judgments, I think that although it is not very pleasant, it is necessary to be able to listen to the other party.
I don't know mj at all, although I'm a stranger in his era, but I'm a nerd and a douchebag... In fact, it was also because I watched hbo's documentary that I accidentally found Michael's personality characteristics very interesting, which aroused my curiosity.
Because of the person who is reflected in the narrative in the film, I think. It is not enough to burst out such powerful spirituality and creativity.
Although I am ignorant, I still know that he has a few very good songs that endure for a long time.
Therefore, I think the mj shown in the film is just a "virtual personality of an art writer" made by common sense, perhaps most of them have a "typical case" feeling formed after artistic bacteria and distorted psychology. It feels like a similar template, although it is in line with the thinking habits of most people.
But too thin.
It felt like it was the result of fulfilling the lustful impression that most people in the world had guessed about him.
The reason why it seems to be full of vividness and realism is not only sensationalism and control of the rhythm of the atmosphere, but the main reason I think should be because it can echo and complement the doubts, guesses and imaginations originally in my mind, especially the clever ones. Show some of his words and behaviors that are similar to typical pedophiles in a guided way - that is, not in a hurry to complain to you like a complaint, but affirm him before burying others. Good feelings, relax some psychological vigilance, and at the same time appear to be more objective, but if you really want to talk about bad things, you will exaggerate and deform, using a morbid and weird method, and suddenly throw out a lot of information. In this way, the audience can only digest a large amount of information while looking at it with an objective analytical attitude, and compare it with the existing memory and accumulated common sense in the brain. Because the amount of information is relatively large, it has to be chewed. Then I found that it matched the child molester pattern in common sense! ! I don't think it's such a coincidence... Then in the four hours of long-haired viewing time, a typical pedophile figure was established little by little. Finally made this judgment. And because it is a conclusion drawn by oneself, it will be very firm and very convinced. Therefore, for a large part of the audience, the acceptance of this film will be relatively high.
But honestly, it's also because the mj they're trying to show is so typical, like a standard answer to an extended answer to the word "jacko".
So I got vigilant. After watching it for the first time, I feel like I need to catch up on my homework on all of this. After reading all kinds of materials for a week, I quickly rewatched the movie.
Haha, how do you say it? Let's start with the central thesis: The film portrays a male child predator with a flawed personality. But this image is not mj.
If he is really like this, it would be too boring and in line with the trend of stereotyped thinking. Regarding this matter, I think the director took it too much for granted when he conceived it.
"If that's all," I don't think it's enough to support the name mj. Because I don't think he is a routine at all, otherwise he wouldn't be at the top, and it wouldn't be impossible to replicate.
The idea of this film is ingenious, the atmosphere rendering and sound effects are also well done, and the rhythm design is also very clever, but there are still some logical flaws from time to time. If you want to use it as a feature film or an interview, it is recommended to be more rigorous. . Otherwise, it feels like a huge waste of money. The screen uses such a large widescreen, and the lighting effects and sound capture are in place. This film will not cost less to make. In fact, it can be a very good commercial film about the unofficial history of characters. It should be able to get a good box office.
But if you want to do a documentary, it's a bit nonsense. The film lacks clear clues, the context is confusing, and the narrative is too exaggerated. It can be seen that the director seems to be trying to make a similar psychological suggestion, but I think as a documentary, I can't find a calm news perspective in it, that is... We should be a bystander. Instead of being involved in it, more data and time information should be provided, and then there should be more comprehensive reference and analysis of relevant scholars, that is, I have been looking for the truth that is enough to convince me. But four hours passed and I couldn't find it. Although the subject matter of sexual assault is not easy to photograph or express, I think it is possible to sort out a set of evidence chain of events that can be falsified. At least not like this one, it feels like a lot of self-defeating things, like james' box of rings
I feel that the director of the film may not know much more about mj than me. ? Because this film feels kind of blunt and fancy. And this kind of trace is like a fox tail, in fact, it should not be easily noticed. This kind of fancy feeling is actually a common problem that is easy to have in imaginary situations created by artificial thinking instead of intuitive creation based on facts. In fact, it is because people, especially those who are creative and artistic, tend to be exaggerated in their brain supplements. Although it can be seen that they are under control, they can still see artificial traces, not a wild feeling. One of the things that struck me the most was the sexual description. Especially that wade spoke so fluently and remembered it too clearly. The smell of ingratiating and undermining is so strong that I can smell it through the screen. And james, first of all the ring box he took out, I think it should be certain, it is definitely not mj's taste. Mj is very particular. From cufflinks to collar pins, he will match his own style. No matter the color or texture of the ring box, it is not something Mj would want to use as a gift. Maybe the director will argue that he used his own box to collect them all. If he really loved and cherished mj like in the movie, he should keep the original box and be reluctant to replace it. Because since the rings are all left, of course, the box sent by mj will be more complete. A little boy who truly loves someone will be reluctant to throw away everything related to the person he likes. I used to be the envelope and gift wrapping paper of the letter that the other person wrote to me. ———
Besides, that ring. Don't you think the ring is too big for a 10-year-old child?
Not to mention that in terms of mj's urination, I don't think he will send such a bunch of rings that don't have any uniqueness and taste that look very ordinary and boring. He is a perfectionist man with a tactile sense of beauty and material. It is definitely better to give gifts than to be indiscriminate. To give something, you have to bring his aesthetic compulsion. At first glance, it is his choice, and he will not begrudge money. This kind of thing will not compromise, because I am almost a similar person... If I give that pile of rings to others, I will feel that I can't give it... Because I don't fully reflect my excellent aesthetics, I don't feel satisfied after I send it, and I still don't give it away. Kind of embarrassing. (I'm pretty good at aesthetics, but I'm just so narcissistic, don't talk about me)
But in fact, what is the purpose of watching the film? If it is out of the consideration of economical income to attract attention, then this large segment of sexual description is ok, because people, especially residents of Western countries, do not like to do in-depth analysis of information. , their cultural characteristic is that they like to receive information with a strong sense of picture and strong visual impact. I prefer to go to the kidneys rather than the brain. This is not a demeaning, personal and honest opinion. Therefore, if you want to sell your attention, these sexual descriptions are just right for them, and they are easy to cause a topic. After all, when people see a sexual assault theme, they will The first thing it induces is a kind of voyeurism, which is impossible. In terms of the characteristics of Western culture, it is even more so... Therefore, people are actually looking forward to seeing the yellow jokes in this kind of movie (refer to "Princess Han" and "Earthworm"). And so on, the barrage has been asking a few minutes before going to bed).
But to be honest, the understanding of michael jackson has been basically blank, except for a few sporadic scandals. So since the interest is aroused, I hope to make a fairer judgment as much as possible. Recently, I happened to be free and silently read as many materials as possible involving all aspects.
Including some domestic and foreign comments and analysis of him and events, his own autobiography, family and friends, autopsy reports, all records of fbi, the lyrics of each song, many memoirs, interview records, etc. Knowing a character with a complex personality for 50 years is not too much, and it is not enough. I just want to get a little bit of control myself. There are too many different opinions, but I always feel that the vast majority of friends have come to a conclusion, and there are very few people who keep an open mind to think and discuss. I don't think this is a very good phenomenon.
Because in fact, no matter how the outside world praised him or criticized him, he felt that he went to two extremes more, but less hit the nail on the head. I think that sometimes fans passively accept information from mj and other fans. Whether it is distress or attack on mj, I always feel that it was born out of anger without careful consideration. Some impressions and perceptions of mj are also.
I think fans really have to control a little bit about this, don't always put a lonely person on the altar for a long time, this is also a kind of not treating him as a human being. Only by looking at all the real situations of this man with equal eyes can we truly understand the man himself, Michael Joseph Jackson. I know that fan filters are inevitable, but I don't think you should refuse to see him, thinking that he is pure and perfect... His good and bad aspects need to be accepted, and it is a shame to be placed on the altar for a long time. Stressful things. He has mentioned it many times in many songs. He will be very, very worried that if he is no longer perfect, he will lose you! That will keep a love-deficient person who values your love for him constantly uneasy
I think this person is worth chewing on. He is a seemingly simple, mysterious, and strange person, but in fact he has a lot of information, a very cutting-edge thinking, a broad perspective, and a very interesting person. The main reason why he would do some incredible things is actually the easy access to nerds and solitary houses--as a social person, he has almost no common sense.
I want to talk about this in detail later. In fact, this film is also a "typical villain" shaped by some experience and common sense as a social person, so I didn't watch it for a long time to understand what was going on. Otherwise, I actually didn't know about it at all, but because he tried too hard...? And unfortunately, this director is a person with relatively ordinary talents and thinking patterns. When he tried so hard to make a story like this, he had no power to hide that ordinaryness, and let the characters he created also have that kind of ordinaryness, just a good job but a common, ordinary, cruel and perverted bitch Local tycoon. Anyone who has seen it will probably get this kind of recognition that is almost the same.
Because this image is very shallow and has no tension, a little digging will get you to the bottom. Basically there are just a few personality traits.
But that's the biggest failure, because anyway. A feature at the top of all features of mj is non-trivial.
Continue later, write so much first. Welcome to exchange
View more about Leaving Neverland reviews
