After reading the old version, it is about an ancient Indian place. As long as the corpse of the creature is buried there, it can be resurrected. The male protagonist's son died in a car accident. My son is a total zombie, okay?

Milo 2021-12-15 08:01:08

The coherence of the plot is worse than the 1989 version, but the horror atmosphere is not as good as the 1989 version, although the latter is not very good. The plot line enhances the shadow of the wife and sister, and also changes the dead child from a boy to a girl. In the ending part, the protagonist kills the returned son and then resurrects his wife by chance. Finally, he was killed by his wife and turned into a family. All three resurrected around the only boy alive hiding in the car. Although some of the fragments of normal life deliberately set the contrast for the ensuing climax, they have separated the creation of the original scary atmosphere, and the overall impression is average.

Kayley 2022-03-26 09:01:06

It feels like the script can't hold up to 90 minutes, and after one hour, you start to enter the traditional ghost movie, and you will finish the plot if you catch up with me. However, the atmosphere is different from pure jump scare. The unexpected feeling is similar to "The Shining". The opening is also a car all the way. The land is in trouble. It is worth recalling that the man who insisted that he only believed in science went so far as to use sorcery (could it be that he thought of Frankenstein?), but the woman of faith finally refused to embrace the living dead. Probably the director still has a very orthodox idea that people cannot be resurrected. But isn't the succession of tragedies the responsibility of traffic planning?