To use this sentence to understand the attitude towards sex, is it that feelings and sex have been separated from the standpoint. If they can be separated, does it seem to be in line with those "sexual freedom" attitudes? Even if it is not promiscuous, it is also an excuse to give a married affair. But -- at the same time, it should probably also be known that this may be a consolation for those who think that affection trumps sex and love, then those who love each other but can't be together, or even be together and have no sex for some reason, isn't it? A heartfelt consolation?
Sex is human, maybe it's not enough to just have Kinsey's report on sex. When human beings started walking upright and now they can make satellites go to the sky, the rational and emotional brains are still constantly coordinating. Whether or not sex and affection are involved in everything that we do not know yet. Looking at his research and his book today, perhaps as a man, I still face the question of "the gun directs the party" or "the party directs the gun", which is some meaningful thinking. Even people who are not obsessed with these issues can understand a little from the experience of a person who studies sex and his attitude towards "sex". Sort the best by yourself.
View more about Kinsey reviews
