To say that the most exciting part of the second episode is that most people feel "nothing" after watching it, which is precisely the satirical attempt of this episode.
In the era of information flooding, people no longer have enough emotional shares to cover every fragment. Audiences greedily receive hot information all over the Internet, but are gradually trained to "only contribute to the top 10" in a passionate life state, as if the story is not outstanding enough, not exciting enough, and not worthy of attention, forming a chain of contempt for fragmented information.
There are too many irony points in the play. Big data crushes the traditional old-fashioned way of police performing tasks. Fragmented information may seem innocuous but may crush a person's life. Life is constantly monitored but no one cares about your needs. The mechanized labeling of the information age has become the usual way of thinking of analyzing people...
For the founder of Fragment App, he made a social software that makes users addicted, but he regularly conducts "network detoxification". In the face of Mo Niang, who is on the other side of the phone, who is really telling the story, at first, he chose the language template to deal with it, and finally finally Tell the truth: "I don't know what to say to you." Too many emotions on the Internet are just a blank page in reality. The burden brought by information overload, from the CEO even if he is meditating, facing this problem The incident is still reflected in the details showing traces of restrained rage.
The false distance between netizens is not my favorite point of irony. The point is that companies use big data to confront national databases, and that no one has helped women find out the cause of her daughter's death. On the surface, in order to protect user privacy, it is easy to mobilize user privacy internally.
All the joys, sorrows and sorrows are flattened in the data. In the era of information deconstruction and fragmentation, both the police’s experience school and the software company’s data school are all defining and labeling criminals without authorization, and truly understand the pain points and weaknesses of criminals. , but the victim of kidnapping, satirized to the extreme.
Don't you feel it after reading it? It's not for me. In fact, there is a feeling, but at the moment of watching this episode, due to the amount of information, it is not obvious and ups and downs, the chaotic and fuzzy feeling is quickly filtered by the brain, and finally the next definition: This is just a safety education film.
Looking back again, I found that I was hit by the screenwriter. In other words, we have become trained "new era netizens" without even realizing it.
The story is over, the phone is put down, and life goes on, it doesn't matter, no one cares about the details and the truth of the story.
View more about Striking Vipers reviews
