I think the screenwriter is terrible, and the leading acting skills are very good. The reason why I am most surprised is that I don’t know what the director is going to convey? I want to tell the audience: Are there such a group of fishermen and warriors who are not afraid of life and death, dare to take risks, and dare to fight with nature? However, the captain played by George Cloony always acted like he was ignoring the storm and irrationally judging the status quo. By inciting speeches, he inspired a group of fishermen who wanted to go home.
This story is adapted from reality, but who knows what the last real thoughts of these people buried in the sea were before their deaths? At the end of the film, the facial expressions of 5 people before death are highlighted. One cried bitterly in the bottom of the bilge, one said that my son would definitely be sad, another said that he would always love the beloved woman, and the captain said that he was sorry to involve Mark's role in it. Who knows if they will regret it? Give them another chance, will they come again? The answer is of course no.
In my opinion, the captain knew that the storm was just ahead but risked his life to fight it because he was reluctant to catch the big fish. It was too arrogant. Later, when he couldn't make it through, he said: We will come again in the future. If you had this idea at the beginning, you don't need to rush into the eyes of the storm. If you finally apologize and say that you are sorry to involve them, who will force them to stay when the crew asked to go home? I really don't know whether to praise the captain's fearless spirit or criticize him for taking great risks with his volition. In the story, he told the crew that he had seen a lot of wind and waves. If the screenwriter wants to highlight that the captain has been walking on the tip of the knife, he needs to have an explanation. Just like this will only highlight that the captain risked a few lives for money and face, and eventually the entire army was wiped out. The captain finally had the chance to leave the ship and float to the surface, but he gave up. He chose to bury him on the sea bottom with the ship, giving up a little chance of survival.
To say that it is moved, it is not without it. The courage and ambition of the captain and crew to fight against nature is worthy of admiration. Although the spirit is worthy of admiration, it is not worthy of praise for being too adventurous and ignoring the natural environment. The more prominent human praise is that a member of the sea rescue team gave up the opportunity to get on the boat in order to save the injured companion who fell into the water, and resolutely took the initiative to fall back into the sea to rescue him. Regardless of whether he is saved or not, the daring to give up the chance of his own life and risk his life to save the lives of others is definitely the highest point of human nature, and one has to be sincerely admired and moved.
I just want to say: Dare to take risks and unremitting fighting spirit is certainly worthy of praise, but there is only one life, if we can choose, there is no one thing worth betting with our only possessions. Winning the bet is only a few thousand yuan, but losing the bet will destroy itself, and the family is sad and desperate. Do you think it's worth it? So those who choose or have to fight on the front line risking their lives are indeed worthy of admiration, but I also hope that the fewer opportunities there are, the better.
View more about The Perfect Storm reviews
