The first part and the second part were watched consecutively. I laughed so hard when I watched the first part, but when I watched the second part, the movie was halfway through, and I didn't laugh once. Not to be laughed at, and even the urge to shut it down.
Personally, I think the film has two major shortcomings in the character setting.
The first one is to use too much force, which obviously means the servant who fry the chicken and make a mess. It is really disturbing the more you look at it, and it is making trouble from beginning to end (all of them have already crossed over for a short period of time, so you can't try it.) Go get used to modern life!!!? ) On the other hand, the first part, although it also creates a comedy atmosphere of chicken flying and dog jumping, but the control of the level of turbulence is relatively good. From the second part, it can be seen that the screenwriter tried very hard to continue the laughs of the first part, which is why the servants and the homeless girls are so noisy, but excessive noise can really make people tired.
The second is to change the heroine. Aside from the appearance, the heroine of the first part feels simple and shrewd, but the temperament of the heroine in the second part is relatively simple-too stupid. , and the effect of the actor's performance is that it is relatively rigid, unnaturally stupid, and very playful. In addition, I am also very curious why the heroine of the first part was asked to play the role of a "passer-by" mother in the second part who asked the hero to help supervise the children's homework. In the same story line, one actor played another role. A character, is this really good? ? ? Anyway, when I was watching that part, I was seriously dancing.
In the end, it is recommended that you only watch the first part, and the second part is not recommended.
View more about The Visitors II: The Corridors of Time reviews
