It's like Chad is tricking Louis into touching the cemetery.
The movie doesn't tell Chad about the resurrected creatures in the cemetery
The meaning of the original book is very clear. After the small animal is resurrected, it can't cause any evil because of its body shape.
The death of the son in the original book has nothing to do with the resurrected cat
Large animals are likely to cause evil events, let alone resurrection of humans
The movie was directly shot as the resurrection cat indirectly caused the death of the child, and then Chad came back with a apology with almost no connection.
Saying that Louis shouldn't touch the cemetery, gives the impression that Chad is the first pot from start to finish...
What kind of modification is this?
View more about Pet Sematary reviews
