Moderate work is not enough

Deonte 2022-03-21 09:02:45

I watched this movie in English class at school. After watching it, my classmates were still excited and applauded? (Strange movie viewing habit) Personally, this movie is a bit of a waste of clones themselves. Ethics and other aspects This kind of thinking has instead become a film that makes people feel good to watch. There are many strange places in the plot setting. From the beginning, the plot in the early stage is relatively conventional. For example, if the experiment fails at the beginning, you can immediately know under what circumstances the male protagonist must succeed suddenly. As soon as I saw the conversation between the male protagonist and his family when he came home, the wife's words that were almost poisonous, plus the driving in the dark and the rainstorm, you could guess that it must be a car accident, and the male protagonist cloned them to start the plot. Of course, these clichés are not a problem, after all, this is just to draw out the key points. However, in the cloning process, why must it be 17 days? And everyone has the same time? Since the rate can be adjusted, why can't it be adjusted to a shorter time? These setting problems are not bad, but the most puzzling thing is that clones have some ethical issues. The problem is obviously insufficiently expressed. The conversation with the wife before the accident in the front paved the way for this aspect. It makes people feel that there will be conflicts around this aspect after the clone, but what is fascinating is that after the clone, although some male protagonists are slow and do not want to tell them they are. The fact of human cloning, and there are also depictions of family members who gradually found something wrong, including the wife's rejection of the male protagonist's memory therapy for her daughter, all of which seem to imply that the danger of technology will be contradictory about the ethical impact of cloning on the technology. At the center, the film is going to be explored in a certain way. But who knew that the movie suddenly changed. It turned out that the previous boss was the villain, and the matter was exposed. To take those people back, it would require technology and tell the male protagonist directly about his evil purpose? This is almost a brain-dead threat and a strange plot. Turning is telling us where is the original contradiction in this movie? This seems to be whipping the audience's expectations. The foreshadowing and ideological design of those families before are just to whet the appetite. As for the chase scene, there are many loopholes, like forcibly dragging the time, not much to mention. Then there is the confrontation at the end of the film, which should be the most exciting place, but the screenwriter's brain hole is really amazing. This technology finally depends on the male protagonist's mind, so the male protagonist chooses to clone himself and then blast the villain in Cooperate with the villain??? And why did the brain question itself like zz when the consciousness was cloned into the simulated brain of the robot? In this case, explain to the first few experimenters before they died that this experiment is not just succeeded? (and the experimenter is supposed to be affectionate) is difficult to explain. And why is an experiment robot this What is it? It feels like the level of armed combat robots in other movies. Co-authoring this company has spent all the money on it? Incomprehensible, incomprehensible. The ending is even more amazing. The male protagonist's family escaped to the island and was extremely happy. The male protagonist's clone and the villain's clone cooperated to get rich?? Why is this technology so dangerous and valuable in this country, and those people in Dubai are so stupid that they only No one thinks of its value as a life extension? The last confrontation to the end is the biggest failure of the film. I really can't think that this kind of film can end like this. There are so many family doubts, cloning one's own thoughts, copying of consciousness (I thought it was a transfer of consciousness, but when I saw the male protagonist, I knew it was a copy, so to clone oneself is not the same as cultivating a successor. ? Although the clone has the same idea as himself, he can't continue to control that person to live. I don't know what the person who wants to clone himself thinks.), human memory manipulation, body manufacturing, memory extraction, clones count as human beings Or the human rights issue of things, etc., etc., these movies are all involved, and you can express a lot of things if you just grab a little bit to express it, but this movie just wastes these settings in vain. , the mindless ending of forcing a happy reunion is utterly embarrassing. Therefore, the whole movie is very mediocre, and there are no highlights worth recommending (if forced to count, the plot is strangely reversed?), if you haven't seen it, you can watch it if you feel bored. plan. So in terms of rating, 5 points are almost the same, because it is impossible to score 5 points, and the average score is high, 2 stars, worthy of the name. It's all involved, and you can express a lot of things if you just grab a little bit of it and express it, but this movie just wastes these settings and ends with a mindless ending that makes the audience happy and forced to reunite, which is embarrassing endlessly. Therefore, the whole movie is very mediocre, and there are no highlights worth recommending (if forced to count, the plot is strangely reversed?), if you haven't seen it, you can watch it if you feel bored. plan. So in terms of rating, 5 points are almost the same, because it is impossible to score 5 points, and the average score is high, 2 stars, worthy of the name. It's all involved, and you can express a lot of things if you just grab a little bit of it and express it, but this movie just wastes these settings and ends with a mindless ending that makes the audience happy and forced to reunite, which is embarrassing endlessly. Therefore, the whole movie is very mediocre, and there are no highlights worth recommending (if forced to count, the plot is strangely reversed?), if you haven't seen it, you can watch it if you feel bored. plan. So in terms of rating, 5 points are almost the same, because it is impossible to score 5 points, and the average score is high, 2 stars, worthy of the name.

View more about Replicas reviews

Extended Reading
  • Icie 2022-04-24 07:01:17

    Samsung. 1. Did Keanu Reeves think about the relatives who left him when he made this film?

  • Derrick 2022-03-25 09:01:15

    I guessed the beginning, but didn't guess the ending

Replicas quotes

  • Will Foster: Boot the mapping sequence.

  • Ed Whittle: I'm not a freaking genie here, OK? I can't just sneeze out another pod.