Not bad, ok, ok.
That's what I felt after watching it.
Here's a question, that is, the terrorist attack at the beginning of the plot took place in Kansas City, more than a thousand kilometers away from the US-Mexico border. I don't know what caused the Americans to think that these three were smuggled from Mexico to the United States. Then if the plot goes on like this, a complete terrorist attack roadmap will come out.
First Yemenis went to Somalia, then Somalis took people by boat to Mexico, and then smuggled to the United States to carry out the attack.
I don't know if you guys have seen another movie called "The Brave Action". In this movie, the head of the terrorist is a Caucasian Muslim (if I remember correctly), this Caucasian boss ran to Southeast Asia to avoid the pursuit of the United States, and then wanted to make a comeback, and ran to pull a group of Jiharin, so he committed suicide It was the Filipinos who acted. Here's their route, first from the Philippines to Somalia, then by plane to an island in Mexico, and finally through the U.S.-Mexico border through the relationship of the gangster's childhood friend (now a South American drug lord) The underground tunnel transported Jiharim to the United States to carry out the attack.
In this way, if the screenwriter follows the clues at the beginning of the movie, it will become a copy of the hero action.
Later, it was estimated that the screenwriter did not do anything, so this clue was cut off.
The screenwriter may be a little messed up, and started to add terrorist activities into it. Later, you told me that Nima made a mistake (of course, this can promote the subsequent plot), this is too construction site (hardcore) screenwriter, right?
View more about Sicario: Day of the Soldado reviews
