Tell a joke, I didn't know the name and theme of this movie before watching it, the reason is that the file name I downloaded was changed by me and then I forgot. I knew it was from Europe and America, but I forgot what it was talking about. Then I saw that the male protagonist hit a pole and realized that something was wrong. I probably knew it was about the rights of men and women.
Let's talk about the advantages of the movie first, that's quite a lot. Not written in chronological order, as detailed as I can remember. Mainly, this movie has a lot of information, which makes people feel very thoughtful, and I try to write as much as possible.
1. The male protagonist is a playboy, and then he entered a feminist world and met a female protagonist who is flirting with flowers;
At the end of the film, the female protagonist, who is flirting with flowers, enters a patriarchal world and meets her playboy again.
The first highlight, echoing the beginning and the end, emphasizes that whether it is male or female power, when the balance of power is tilted, cunning and deceit, money and power will always be divided into superiors and inferiors, just as women in the feminist world treat men as fun, The male protagonist in the male-dominated world disrespects women;
The second highlight is that both male and female protagonists like to record the number of times they conquered the opposite sex. This is echoed in the male protagonist’s meeting and the female protagonist’s room. This is a psychological distortion and perversion in disguise, in order to satisfy their own sense of conquest And a sense of accomplishment, they chose this way to record and recall, which is a great disrespect to the other party, and also shows their most direct and dark side as the victors of power.
2. When the film was in a feminist society, it was full of mirror elements of a male-dominated society. For example, when the female protagonist invited the male protagonist, she opened her chest and introduced her lizard pet (I think this ferocious pet is a symbol of power) , In women's meetings, they basically wear suits, play poker, ridicule men, waiters are men, women give birth to children standing up, women relieve themselves by standing up, and women talk to introduce their male companions by the way at the party, In xo, women take the initiative, the streets are full of advertisements and sexual cues of male characters, and the men's rights movement initiated by men, and if you feel uncomfortable when you see these pictures, then please substitute these actions into male behavior, you will I think it is understandable, so all the unacceptable behaviors in this film are completely corresponding to the actions in the male-dominated society.
3. Finally, returning to the patriarchal world, which is the current world, is quite exciting, because this ending enlightens the audience, which is equivalent to educating the audience with negative teaching materials, and then letting the audience think about what to do next.
4. The film subverts people's daily cognition with a considerable impact, making people realize that after the reversal of power, they will be so uncomfortable, thus resulting in empathy, if men are dominated by women. Dumping, how embarrassing and unbearable it must be.
It is here, however, that there are some drawbacks.
1. The film cannot profoundly reveal the difference between a male-dominated society and a female-dominated society and the necessity of which one should exist.
Because the film just replicates the male-dominated society to the feminist-dominated society, and does not give a model that should exist. For example, women are relieved by standing up, which is completely inconsistent with physiological habits. This kind of copying is more rigid, although I can It is understood that this is an exaggeration in disguised form, but it is completely okay not to have this picture, it will appear superfluous and make the whole behavior seem ridiculous. The correct mode of behavior should be, starting from the status of women, to imagine that if women will prevail, then what should be done differently from male power. Even wearing a suit is not in line with women's habits. This does not take into account that even in a feminist society, women can have beautiful dress and appearance, rather than simply copying the behavior of male society.
So, I think, as other comments have said, this film is not to point out which kind of rights is better, but to equal rights, that is, the rights of men and women should be properly equal, and there should be no preference for one over the other, so this is the main point of the film, so It seems that some of the pictures set in this film are slightly reasonable, and I can interpret those absurdities as exaggerated, abrupt, and eye-catching.
2. The film lacks some deeper exploration and plot.
The film depicts too much sex, which will make people feel that the difference between male-dominated society and feminist society is mainly in sex, but sex is only a necessary element, and other aspects need to be exposed, such as discrimination in job recruitment, high-level gender discrimination, Job type discrimination, gender preference discrimination, etc., can be shown, but the film's description of sex is too extensive, the theme is a little thin, and it fails to describe the life of a feminist society more excitingly. Of course, I can also find reasons to justify the director, that is, the film is to create such an environment to tell about a feminist society, rather than a feminist society created to criticize the real society. For example, the director may just want to show that if society should be dominated by feminists, then there is no need to discriminate against work sex in reality (the discrimination I am talking about is different from the waiters in the movie. The former is discrimination in various aspects, and the latter It should not be regarded as discrimination, but a kind of right tilt) in the film, because this is naturally reflected in the society of rights, and it is a hidden scene that does not need to be filmed. And if you want to criticize work sexism in the real world, you need to set up a job fair, tell the unspoken rules of human resources managers, eliminate all male candidates who participate in recruitment, and leave female candidates, or set up a meeting, Replace all executives with women and demote all men. This is directly related to the artistic and social effects that the film wants to produce.
Therefore, I think the director does not need to dwell on the scenes that seem to be deliberately mocking male behavior in the feminist society, and can openly shoot some materials that can directly point out the problems of the male-dominated society.
The background music is very nice, the plot of the whole movie is smooth, and the fact that the heroine is married is a wonderful thing, which is amazing.
View more about I Am Not an Easy Man reviews
