The knights will argue over whether they should believe in God, perhaps because their relationship with Rome has only one agreement. They are as fragile and sensitive as ordinary people, and hesitate to be attacked by a sense of nothingness from time to time. But they believed Arthur with all their heart. And Arthur imagined that Rome was a city of equality and freedom, so even if the bishop asked him to complete a mission that was almost dead, he was only angry and did not doubt his beliefs. Feeling sorrowful, the bishop tossed the piece that Arthur cherished, and the family that was saved cruelly tortured the pagans, and the faith that Arthurs desperately maintained was slightly tainted by the so-called messengers of God. In the face of the reality that there is no freedom and equality, those beliefs in Rome seem ridiculous and unreasonable. Therefore, faith is just faith, fragile, simple, cannot be misinterpreted a little bit, and cannot be imposed on life.
If you like Arthur, a person can make a difference, but personal actions must be targeted at higher goals to make sense. When his dream was shattered, he found the sense of justice to help the weak and the strong, and the instinctive desire to pursue freedom and equality. He is the hero of the fight for freedom, but he doesn't know how powerful faith is, and why in the end, a perfect God will have such problems. Well, he still can't get rid of the manipulation of religious forces. Therefore, seeing him and his knight fighting sadly, they were not as moved as they were when they saw "Brave Heart". They were also for freedom, but they didn't know what freedom was.
The movie is very long, but it still feels thin and does not explain many things, such as Lancelot's feelings about Guinevera, Arthur's mental journey, etc. The plot is a bit quick. Movies like this are becoming more entertaining, or the traces of entertainment are becoming more and more obvious. Hey, I'm a little disappointed.
View more about King Arthur reviews
