Whether it's the first episode or the second episode, the issues discussed are only one of the most basic human nature, and have nothing to do with occupation. Isn't easy success always accompanied by a reluctant pursuit of vanity and materialism? In my opinion, I feel a little too much for this and this kind of feeling.
The second episode is even more inexplicable. The investigative reporter does not investigate himself. Is he a psychiatrist who investigates himself? ? ? If he could investigate himself, he should be a psychiatrist, not an investigative journalist. The idea of this basic point feels too forced, and I feel embarrassed in order to express a concept. There is only one protagonist in an entire episode, and all the ideas are based on him. The basic idea that can't stand a little scrutiny is really embarrassing.
Looking at the whole is to express a big concept, but because it is a fantasy drama, it is really inexplicable to force human nature to be completely perfect, and to find fault with human nature. In contrast, Black Mirror's depiction of human nature is much more than this one. Black Mirror makes people feel like a human nature drama wrapped in science fiction, and this feeling is purely a fantasy drama with a human shell. Contrasted in conception
Black Mirror is perfect whether it is attractive from a sci-fi point of view or a depiction of human nature.
And the feeling of this drama really relies on brain holes. I really feel that it is better not to portray this human nature, which is extremely embarrassing and too shallow. What does it feel like?
The first episode felt like a depressed person finally got attention, and then people all over the world told him that you shouldn't get attention, and he chose to continue to get attention. The final result was that he was judged by the Yin-Yang Demon Realm? Isn't this the hook that the Yin-Yang Demon Realm gave him.
The feeling of the second episode is that a person is trusted, and then there is a podcast that predicts the future, which makes him uneasy, and the whole episode is like the podcast is trying to induce a person to go crazy. In the end, it makes people feel that a person with professionalism and willingness to investigate the unknown truth was used and killed by everyone? ? ?
In just two episodes, the feeling is that the fantasy part is purely to attract ordinary people to commit suicide, to kill ordinary people, and to act as if this person has a very big moral problem. The question shouldn't comedians find ways to entertain the audience? Shouldn't investigative reporters investigate facts? To highlight moral issues, what you do is to induce people to follow their own professional qualities, and finally make a reversal and force the protagonist to express the protagonist at the end. Is there a problem? ?
really disappointing
At least the movie version itself criticizes the mistakes of behavior, and it is the people themselves who make mistakes and then be judged. These two episodes are all about making mistakes, and then you're not allowed to live.
I have seen the movie version on the Internet, which part is much stronger than these two episodes, and the intention is also more obvious. Hope it gets better, not worse.
View more about The Twilight Zone reviews
