In the past two days, I inadvertently turned to a "documentary" called " Leaving Neverland ", which mainly focused on the truth and falsehood of " Michael Jackson's child molestation case ". The slogan is to expose the truth of the facts.
I am not a fan of MJ, certainly not a black fan, I just listen to his music and MV occasionally. It's not a big deal. It's not that fans can completely ignore it, but for fans, it's a big thing to insult idols.
I watched this 236-minute feature film carefully with the attitude of knowing the truth. After watching it, I was shocked. What is this all about? The whole film is two people talking to themselves about how they were molested and humiliated by MJ when they were young, which is unbearable to look back on. Then the wives and parents of the two came out to add fuel and jealousy, expressing that it was really painful.
I thought I could come up with any strong evidence, but there was no. Relying entirely on emotional rendering to convince the audience, is this also called a documentary? Seems like a waste of time. In fact, it was impossible to distinguish the true from the false many years ago. The first is that the deceased has passed away, and the investigation cannot be continued. show his innocence.
Even the FBI can't find the evidence, and you want to guide the audience when you make a movie? As an outsider, of course I allow and hope that there are different voices in this world, but I hate those who use public opinion for profit. What's even more frightening is that there are still people who believe this kind of nonsense that has no evidence~
Someone even left a message saying: If they are all lies, then they must be the best actor at the Oscars next year. Their mothers, siblings must also be nominated for best male and female supporting roles! It's too realistic! Hollywood should cry for it!
The arguments these people believe are all: These people are telling the truth . Humans are emotional animals. Seeing the emotional and emotional performance in the movie, and crying bitterly, he felt sympathy, and immediately thought that MJ had bribed the FBI to cover up his crime. But is it possible? Can it be bought for a while, and can it be bought for ten years after death? Regardless of whether they are acting or not, from a legal point of view, they cannot just rely on one-sided self-talk. No matter how realistic they are, they can't tell the truth, can they? The law still depends on the evidence. The lie about this time reminds me of a movie - The Hunt .
This story is truly hopeless. The film tells the story of a 4-year-old girl who sued her kindergarten teacher for sexual harassment (lie), but the teacher couldn't argue. Children are a special vulnerable group in society, and they are immature both physically and mentally. Once something is suspected of harming a child, the whole society will always stand on the side of the child without reservation and attack the perpetrators, even if there is no evidence. People firmly believe that such a young child can't lie, there is no groundless truth in this world. But they were wrong. Faced with this accusation, the teacher has since lost his job, lost his family, and was even threatened with a gun to the head.
Who can debunk this lie? Regarding MJ, many people actually have an attitude, and their hearts are full of sympathy for the "weak", so they ignore the evidence and focus on defeating the "evil".
Sympathy for the weak is a good quality of human beings and a manifestation of human kindness. There is nothing wrong with it. But it is wrong to be exploited for this quality.
The reason why I think of this topic is that we hope that we will be as rational as possible when dealing with things that may hurt others, whether the other party is strong or weak. Because once you make a mistake, it will be hard to recover, and the harm you will bring to others is eternal. Write here and share.
View more about Leaving Neverland reviews
