Recently, I am very interested in the profession of psychiatrist. I read a lot of posts and saw that this drama was used as a textbook for prospective psychologists, so I used it to study it.
Although I just started watching two episodes, the biggest impression of this profession in general is that a psychiatrist is like a mirror, reflecting the true side of the patient. In our life, there are often all kinds of filters buried in our own true thoughts, and the role of a psychologist is to guide the true self, so that patients are aware of their own thoughts, face and try to change or take action. This process is actually very interesting, like peeling garlic, layer by layer to the center. It's full of drama, and it's very suitable for drama or this kind of dialogue-style soap opera. Both patients in the first two episodes were aggressive and seemed to be asking the doctor to talk about their feelings. So at the same time as the patient's monologue, although the doctor is just an audience, we are actually getting to know the protagonist of the play.
The first episode is a delimma of a classic doctor and patient, who has been talking to a stranger for a long time, and it seems that falling in love is a natural thing?
Although the protagonist's personality is domineering in the second episode, we learned the doctor's background from this character. We know that he has first-class medical skills and is one of the best in the industry. At the same time, the doctor pointed out that the "best" in this industry is actually a false proposition. It is best to make a subjective evaluation of each person, and there are many elements of personal color. (I wonder if there is no bad psychiatrist? As long as the treatment does not stop, it is a process of deepening understanding, a process of enhancing goodwill?) The idea that "the role of a psychiatrist is to guide the true self" I It was also seen in the second episode that the pilot talked about a lot of things and was finally chained up by the psychiatrist to ask him if he was invisibly condemning himself and surrendered the overbearing pilot.
In the fifth episode, we saw Gina, a psychiatrist's friend, and found that the psychiatrist was very irritable and easily influenced by his patients. He also needed others to enlighten. At the same time, we also saw that the dialogue between psychologists is actually very straight to the point. And given that they were friends before, this informal treatment showed that the entanglement between the two had not been filtered out. So I'm curious how psychiatrists deal with the pain in my life? I remember a previous paper by a psychiatrist friend who researched the impact of social media on the private life of psychiatrists. His conclusion was that it was good and bad.
Meditation has a purpose to live in the moment, and our dialogue with therapy seems to be the opposite, always returning to those moments to relive the mood of but, and to understand it, as if live in the moment and reflect goes hand in hand.
At the same time, I actually admire the fact that it is not easy for the male lead to grasp the relationship with so many people, just like playing the role of everyone.
The dialogue between the doctor and the pilot in episode 7 once again made people realize the insight of the psychiatrist. The doctor is a passive role. The pilot made a decision and used the doctor's decision as a validation of what he did before. In fact, he was afraid of taking on it. responsibility for making choices.
View more about In Treatment reviews
