I need to make an explanation, so that everyone doesn’t understand what I’m talking about (Damn Broadcasting): The ending was cut in the domestic version. The real ending is that Arthur and Jr. Joseph were both hit by a train, and then another One world saw Arthur's wife, and the family went away. ------------------I am the dividing line of the main text ---------------- When I just watched this movie, I I think the ending is extremely cheating-no other words can more accurately express my opinion of it-it is really cheating Arthur The father of Kipp, after all, he wants to protect his children so much, and he really worked hard to achieve his expected goal. So even though the drama has been passed through on Weibo and I know what the ending of the movie is, when the whole movie just ended, I really felt that the story was inexplicable. But now, I believe that at least for me, the theme expressed in this movie is worth these five stars. I have translated some interviews with Daniel as the lead actor before. If I understand correctly, the sentence he said "The original book is about the story of the past-it is a flashback when my character is already an old man-the movie "There is no such thing" seems to indicate that Arthur in the original work has lived for a long time. Of course, I haven't read the original work. Without knowing the details, I can only return to this movie. In the current movie, Arthur and Joseph Jr. ended in this way. Although Arthur was very depressed about his wife's passing, and seemed to be very sad all the time, but from the perspective of the whole article, I believe that he hopes that he will be more able to live with his son. The obvious manifestation is that he is still working hard (he was arranged to handle the affairs of the deceased Mrs. Drablow), intending not to do it well and not to leave; in the end, he saw little Joseph in danger at the train station or he did not hesitate to save him. The first sentence after arriving in the other world was to find Sam, obviously wishing his son and himself are safe. But when he understood what was going on, he didn’t think about why he had helped the black woman find her son, but she wanted to kill her son. On the contrary, he held his son and walked directly with his wife. ——He is not the woman in black who will resent the innocent. This is what makes me think this ending is quite interesting to think about. The effort to come to Arthur was actually based on his own cognition, based on the cognition of a person who can face death calmly. He felt that as long as he helped that woman find her child, she who had already given up her life would definitely be able to go on. Instead of staying in a world that does not belong to her and doing something unreasonable. What's beyond his cognition is that some people do things so unreasonably, they live like this, they die like this. And this can't change Arthur's face of life and fate always so calm and calm, life and death are the same. Perhaps the only thing that didn't cheat was that after Arthur's hard work, little Joseph did not become a wandering spirit full of resentment like other children. I tried very hard to not mention Harry Potter above, now I have to mention it. From the interviews during the promotion of this movie, it can be seen that although Daniel’s two stage plays have a good reputation, they are even professional The award is affirmed, but after all, the movie is still a movie. He really hopes to no longer overlap with Harry Potter's elements on the silver screen. He said that if the new character's name is still called Harry, he will be a little taboo. But on the other hand, he must also face: "I have been mediating with fans for a long time. Some people hope that I will always be Harry's." In this regard, I want to say that the new character can indeed interact with Ha in terms of appearance. Lee is separated, but in essence, many places are exactly the same as Xiaoha, which leads me to watch this film-I don't know how everyone is-I have "Harry Potter's both visual sense" appearing more than once. . The first is curiosity. Daniel pointed out in an interview that Arthur has always had a strong curiosity about the secrets of the house. As for the source of this curiosity-Daniel said that he almost wanted to shake Arthur's shoulder and tell him to hurry up. It was no good to leave the house and stay there, but then I understood that Arthur wanted to make sure that his wife had gone to another world and was in a good mood. This is not much different from Harry Potter. Strange noises are always heard in "The Chamber of Secrets", "Batik Rauch" is found in Moody's office in the original "Goblet of Fire", and so on. Wait, he was going to find out, but maybe Harry's curiosity was purer. The look of Arthur in "The Woman in Black" with an axe in one hand and a candle in the other hand really reminds me of Harry in "The Prisoner" with a wand in one hand and a survival map in one hand to find Peter Pettigrew (the movie has been adapted ), as a diehard Harry, it is inevitable that there is a warm feeling in my heart when I look at it. Then there is the courage to save people. I believe that if it was Harry, when he knew there was a child in the burning house, he would definitely save her-even Draco, who had always had a bad relationship with him, could risk it in the responsive house. The dangerous fire was saved. It's a pity that this time there is no Ron to escort him, nor Hermione to open the way ahead, nor the mighty and domineering flying broomstick, nor the agility that James Potter has given him. (PS: From here, it can actually be proved that Xiao Ha’s patron saint has always been stag, and it makes sense for the first son to use "Jaime" first. He knows how important his father is.) And there are so many ghosts. I really want to say to the friend who shouted the patron saint curse, you are not alone. Of course there are people who want to say "Harry, your wand!
View more about The Woman in Black reviews
